2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3969548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The End of Life Choice Act: A Proposed Implementation and Research Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Access is referenced by items 5, 9, 11, 13, 14. Balancing safety and access is an important policy goal of any AD system [ 1 , 2 , 38 , 39 ]. Access must be facilitated for eligible people, while restricting access to those who are not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Access is referenced by items 5, 9, 11, 13, 14. Balancing safety and access is an important policy goal of any AD system [ 1 , 2 , 38 , 39 ]. Access must be facilitated for eligible people, while restricting access to those who are not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) is one of the latest jurisdictions to enact such legislation [ 1 ]. In November 2021, the End of Life Choice Act 2019 (the Act) came into force after a public referendum supported its introduction [ 2 ]. Given the nature and complexity of this new health service, in particular concerns regarding safety and accessibility in a bicultural environment unique to Aotearoa New Zealand, [ 3 ] research is vital to determine how the service is being implemented and integrated into end of life care [ 2 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most health-care professionals are trained to promote and maintain life and often have difficulty when faced with the often-rapid decline and death of people with terminal illnesses. By contrast, data suggest that early and open discussion of EOL issues with patients and families allows time for reflection and planning, can obviate the introduction of unwanted interventions or procedures, can provide reassurance, and can alleviate fear [ 25 , 26 ]. These benefit both patients and palliative health professionals [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Palliative Care Health Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, data suggest that early and open discussion of EOL issues with patients and families allows time for reflection and planning, can obviate the introduction of unwanted interventions or procedures, can provide reassurance, and can alleviate fear [ 25 , 26 ]. These benefit both patients and palliative health professionals [ 26 , 27 ]. Patients’ perspectives regarding EOL interventions and use of technologies might differ from those of the health professionals involved in their care, and health-care professionals should recognise this and respect the patient’s autonomy [ 28 ].…”
Section: Palliative Care Health Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%