1998
DOI: 10.2307/1224053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Encyclopedia of Rhododendron Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 N), but also the only species examined outside of the Sino-Himalaya, which makes it difficult to determine the cause of the observed pattern. Additionally, differences among subgenera may be linked to clade-specific morphological characters such as leaf habit (Cox & Cox 1997;Goetsch et al 2005). The deciduous subgenus Pentanthera, for example, might experience less stress through winter conditions or drought compared to the rest of our species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 N), but also the only species examined outside of the Sino-Himalaya, which makes it difficult to determine the cause of the observed pattern. Additionally, differences among subgenera may be linked to clade-specific morphological characters such as leaf habit (Cox & Cox 1997;Goetsch et al 2005). The deciduous subgenus Pentanthera, for example, might experience less stress through winter conditions or drought compared to the rest of our species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the genus Rhododendron is strongly linked with geography (Irving and Hebda, 1993), which makes it difficult to speculate about the cause of the observed pattern. One possibility, however, is that differences among subgenera are associated with clade‐specific characters such as leaf habit (Cox and Cox, 1997; Goetsch et al, 2005), with leaves in subgenus Pentanthera being deciduous, in Hymenanthes evergreen, and in Rhododendron sometimes semi‐evergreen. Also, for example, leaf morphology and age at first reproduction are known to differ significantly between the major groups (Medeiros et al, 2017; R. Milne, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%