2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0203_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Empirical Development of the Child-Parent Communication Apprehension Scale for Use With Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervision was reverse-coded, so that a higher score indicated better supervision. Caregiver communication (past 2 months) was measured using an adapted version of the Child-Parent Communication Apprehension Scale for use with Young adults [ 40 ]. The scale asks about adolescent-caregiver overall communication as well as communication on sensitive issues, such as medication and sex, α = 0.56–0.75.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervision was reverse-coded, so that a higher score indicated better supervision. Caregiver communication (past 2 months) was measured using an adapted version of the Child-Parent Communication Apprehension Scale for use with Young adults [ 40 ]. The scale asks about adolescent-caregiver overall communication as well as communication on sensitive issues, such as medication and sex, α = 0.56–0.75.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervision was reverse-coded, so that a higher score indicated better supervision. Caregiver communication (past two months) was measured using an adapted version of the Child-Parent Communication Apprehension Scale for use with Young adults (40). The scale asks about adolescent-caregiver overall communication as well as communication on sensitive issues, such as medication and sex, α = 0.56-0.75.…”
Section: Explanatory and Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of psychological constructs, communication apprehension consistently has been associated negatively with individuals' tendencies to communicate across relational contexts (Barraclough, Christophel, & McCroskey, 1988;Lucchetti, Powers, & Love, 2002;Martin & Myers, 2006;Martin, Valencic, & Heisel, 2002;Wheeless, 1984;McCroskey & Richmond, 1977) whereas communication competence has been associated positively with individuals' tendencies to communicate across relational contexts (Lee, 1988a(Lee, , 1988bMartin, Byrnes, & Myers, 2009;Sallinen-Kuparinen, McCroskey, & Richmond, 1991;Teven, Richmond, McCroskey & McCroskey, 2010), including academic mentoring relationships (Hawkins, 1991;Kalbfleisch & Davies, 1993). Thus, graduate students' scores on the ARMS should be related negatively to their reports of communication apprehension but related positively to their reports of communication competence, and may be one way in which construct validity of the ARMS can be established.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%