2020
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2020.1858299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The empirical Bayes estimators of the rate parameter of the inverse gamma distribution with a conjugate inverse gamma prior under Stein's loss function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the estimators and and the PESLs and depend on and , where 1 2 and 0 , we can plot the surfaces of the estimators and the PESLs on the domain via the R function persp3d() in the R package rgl (see ( Adler and Murdoch, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2021 )). We remark that the R function persp() in the R package graphics can not add another surface to the existing surface, but persp3d() can.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the estimators and and the PESLs and depend on and , where 1 2 and 0 , we can plot the surfaces of the estimators and the PESLs on the domain via the R function persp3d() in the R package rgl (see ( Adler and Murdoch, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2021 )). We remark that the R function persp() in the R package graphics can not add another surface to the existing surface, but persp3d() can.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, we should not choose the squared error loss function, but choose a loss function which penalizes gross overestimation and gross underestimation equally, that is, an action a will incur an infinite loss when it tends to 0 or ∞ . Stein’s loss function has this property, and thus it is recommended to use for the positive restricted parameter space by many authors (see for example ( James and Stein, 1961 ; Petropoulos and Kourouklis, 2005 ; Oono and Shinozaki, 2006 ; Bobotas and Kourouklis, 2010 ; Zhang, 2017 ; Xie et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ; Sun et al, 2021 )). In the normal model with a known mean μ , our parameters of interest are θ = σ 2 (a variance parameter) and θ = σ (a scale parameter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the hierarchical Bayesian model, 60 the posterior distribution of influence line identification can be constructed as follows: p(),,|cσ2μ2boldRboldmp()|,boldRboldmcσ2p()σ2p()|cμ2p()μ2 p()|,boldRboldmcσ2 and p()|cμ2 are determined by Equations (7) and (8). For the convenience of calculation, the prior probability density functions of parameters σ2 and μ2 are determined by the principle of conjugate priori and are expressed by the inverse gamma distribution 61 : p()σ2β0α0normalΓ()α0σ2()α0goodbreak+1eβ0σ2 p()μ2β1α1normalΓ()α1μ2()α1+1eβ1μ2 where (),α0β0 and (),α1β1 are the hyperparameters of the inverse gamma distributions.…”
Section: Bil Identification Based On Bayesian Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Þare determined by Equations ( 7) and (8). For the convenience of calculation, the prior probability density functions of parameters σ 2 and μ 2 are determined by the principle of conjugate priori and are expressed by the inverse gamma distribution 61 :…”
Section: Posterior Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%