2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11101156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Empirical Application of Automotive 3D Radar Sensor for Target Detection for an Autonomous Surface Vehicle’s Navigation

Abstract: Avoiding collisions with other objects is one of the most basic safety tasks undertaken in the operation of floating vehicles. Addressing this challenge is essential, especially during unmanned vehicle navigation processes in autonomous missions. This paper provides an empirical analysis of the surface target detection possibilities in a water environment, which can be used for the future development of tracking and anti-collision systems for autonomous surface vehicles (ASV). The research focuses on identifyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short prediction time is needed to meet the requirements for vehicle motion control time [17]. The challenges of anti-collision tasks in a water environment were presented in [18], but the test was provided for a small autonomous surface vehicle using radar sensors. When choosing a DLNN type [19], the following factors should be considered: accuracy, size and prediction time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short prediction time is needed to meet the requirements for vehicle motion control time [17]. The challenges of anti-collision tasks in a water environment were presented in [18], but the test was provided for a small autonomous surface vehicle using radar sensors. When choosing a DLNN type [19], the following factors should be considered: accuracy, size and prediction time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, sensors that can detect the activity of other vehicles at a sufficient distance to prevent an accident considering driver reaction times and Vehicle speed can be too costly to widely penetrate the market. Many ADAS implementations therefore use in-vehicle sensors to produce warning signals based on information from a limited range of up to 100 or 150 meters from the vehicle [14]. However, this range may not be sufficient to anticipate a possible collision risk arising from traffic further downstream from the subject vehicle in time for the driver to safely conduct necessary actions to prevent a dangerous situation, especially in a free flow traffic state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, environment perception is the foundation to achieve all these above-mentioned requirements. Various sensors are applied for the USV perception, such as camera [1] and radar [2,3]. Due to size limitations, such USVs have a small load capacity and cannot be mounted many sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%