1989
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511720482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Empire of Chance

Abstract: The Empire of Chance tells how quantitative ideas of chance transformed the natural and social sciences, as well as daily life over the last three centuries. A continuous narrative connects the earliest application of probability and statistics in gambling and insurance to the most recent forays into law, medicine, polling and baseball. Separate chapters explore the theoretical and methodological impact in biology, physics and psychology. Themes recur - determinism, inference, causality, free will, evidence, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
205
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 761 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
205
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We cannot assume that without proper training biomedical and social science graduates would get miraculously enlightened about probability. Some of the best symbolic thinking minds of humanity devoted hundreds of years to the proper understanding of probability and statisticians still do not agree on how best to draw statistical inference (Stigler, 1986;Gigerenzer et al, 1989), e.g., the recent American Statistical Association statement on p-values (Wasserstein and Lazar, 2016) was accompanied by 21 editorials from the statisticians and methodologists who participated in crafting it and who disagreed in different aspects among themselves.…”
Section: Increase Statistical Power and Publish Pre-study Power Calcumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot assume that without proper training biomedical and social science graduates would get miraculously enlightened about probability. Some of the best symbolic thinking minds of humanity devoted hundreds of years to the proper understanding of probability and statisticians still do not agree on how best to draw statistical inference (Stigler, 1986;Gigerenzer et al, 1989), e.g., the recent American Statistical Association statement on p-values (Wasserstein and Lazar, 2016) was accompanied by 21 editorials from the statisticians and methodologists who participated in crafting it and who disagreed in different aspects among themselves.…”
Section: Increase Statistical Power and Publish Pre-study Power Calcumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern human sciences developed two distinct forms of normalization. Historians of 19th century statistics (e.g., Gigerenzer, Swijtink, Porter, & Daston, 1989;Hacking, 1990) have distinguished Durkheim's socially conservative understanding of the average as the ideal -flanked by symmetrical pathological deviations -from Galton's socially progressive notion of people of unusual intelligence as cherished exceptions that might drag society forward from its currently mediocre state (e.g., Galton, 1869). Indeed, there is some evidence that Foucault understood this distinction.…”
Section: The Power Of the Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is delusional to think that a technique such as NPV can transcend such diversity and complexity. As Gigerenzer et al (1989) state: 'No amount of mathematical legerdemain can transform uncertainty into certainty'. However, management soothsayers -whether in airport departure lounge books, executive training courses or MBA classescontinue to misdirect managers, students and others with exaggerated claims about the calculability of the future.…”
Section: Misleading Conceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%