2004
DOI: 10.1080/0143659042000185381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The empire of capital and the remaking of centre–periphery relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, importing volunteers may undermine or overshadow other expressions of community solidarity, such as informal community networks, unions, local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and cooperatives (Lasker ). Second, scholars such as Escobar () and Makki () have argued that development efforts re‐create the colonial social structure that was accepted until 1945. Third, volunteering is often thought of as a practice “helping activities… engaged in without expectation of reward” (Snyder and Omoto :3), and voluntourism has become a fashionable way of “traveling with a purpose” (Brown :479).…”
Section: The Voluntouristsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, importing volunteers may undermine or overshadow other expressions of community solidarity, such as informal community networks, unions, local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and cooperatives (Lasker ). Second, scholars such as Escobar () and Makki () have argued that development efforts re‐create the colonial social structure that was accepted until 1945. Third, volunteering is often thought of as a practice “helping activities… engaged in without expectation of reward” (Snyder and Omoto :3), and voluntourism has become a fashionable way of “traveling with a purpose” (Brown :479).…”
Section: The Voluntouristsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics also problematize the modernist, teleological idea of progress that underpins nation brands in the context of globalization (Krishnaswamy, ). Representations of former colonized nations as “young” and in the early stages of commercial development, which emerged as a representation in postwar ideologies (Rostow, ) to overcome (rhetorically at least) the colonial dichotomy of a civilized power and its “primitive” subjects (Makki, ), have continued within globalization discourses. Former colonized nations and their inhabitants are located in a perpetual “derivative discourse” where they can only be the “consumers of modernity,” since modernity itself is located in European urban industrialized worlds (Chatterjee, , p. 5).…”
Section: Narrating Nations: the “Promise” Of Nation Branding In Globamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, global trade organizations and multinationals, dominated by imperialist nations, determine what form the market takes. The resulting uneven playing field means that global inequalities continue to grow, protecting those who have historically enjoyed power and increasing the marginalization of those on the periphery (Makki, ; Pieterse, ). The pattern is reflected within nations too, as neoliberal market reforms remove protection for the poorest and privilege the interests of capital over individual or collective well‐being (Parameswaran, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the 19th century, the Global South was firmly embedded in a discourse of development and improvement – what Vernon ironically refers to as the ‘humanitarian discovery of hunger’ (2007, 4). In an extraordinary act of historical amnesia, Global South poverty is re‐codified as a symptom of native incompetence, and in the process, whole populations become the locus of a new ‘will to improve’ (Friedmann 2004; Makki 2004; Li 2007). In other terms, biopower resurfaces in the guise of developmentalism (Escobar 1995; Legg 2006; Watts 2003).…”
Section: Colonial Agribusinessmentioning
confidence: 99%