2019 3rd School on Dynamics of Complex Networks and Their Application in Intellectual Robotics (DCNAIR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/dcnair.2019.8875613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emperical mode decomposition for ECG signal preprocessing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following are the main observations that have been made from the literature on ECG signal preprocessing ( (Uwaechia & Ramli, 2021); (Tychkov et al, 2019); (Rahman et al, 2019) b) Filtering from FIR ranges at a very high frequency, which makes it more time consuming and requires large storage.…”
Section: Figure 1: Ecg Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are the main observations that have been made from the literature on ECG signal preprocessing ( (Uwaechia & Ramli, 2021); (Tychkov et al, 2019); (Rahman et al, 2019) b) Filtering from FIR ranges at a very high frequency, which makes it more time consuming and requires large storage.…”
Section: Figure 1: Ecg Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being challenging for preserving important signal information, and adapting to the patient's features, preprocessing has attracted the attention of researchers. Cleaning and transformation are also performed during the preprocessing stage [91]. Other techniques are also used during the preprocessing stage, such as downsampling, resampling and signal normalization [58].…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it an uphill task to identify and isolate such low energy level fault signals; however, time-frequency-domain signal processing techniques have strong capabilities in decomposing vibrational signals into several energy levels [24][25][26] and this makes it possible for them to identify and isolate fault signals at various levels. The short-time Fourier transform (STFT), wavelet transform (WT) and the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) are some of the popular techniques for time-frequencydomain feature extraction; however, due to their limitations (STFT is limited by the choice of window function [24], the EMD has a high sensitivity to noise [25] and WT is unreliable for long-range dependencies [26]), the use of MFCCs and their derivatives as reliable features for diagnostics (and prognostics) problems have recently attracted global attention because of their remarkably significant immunity to noise and robustness in extracting underlying nonlinear characteristics from stationary and non-stationary signals [14][15][16]. Figure 1 shows the schematic procedure for extracting MFCCs from a signal; however, the stages summarized below provide the stages for their extraction.…”
Section: Time-frequency-domain Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ is the standard deviation and X is the mean of X i (i = 1, 2, ..., N) Some studies have tried solving this problem [24] by expanding the nonlinear RBF kernel into its Maclaurin series, and then computing the weight vector w from the series according to the contribution made to classification hyperplane by each feature; however, the high level of assumptions on which its effectiveness depends. High computational costs associated with this approach makes it non-feasible for near real-time industrial applications.…”
Section: Svm-rbf-rfe Algorithm For Fault Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%