2016
DOI: 10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.4.514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emotional Intelligence, Defense Mechanism and Interpersonal Caring Behavior by Enneagram Personality Types in Nursing Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also found in other studies that measured nursing students' emotional intelligence using the same tool. Kim [49] analyzed the effects of nursing students' metacognition and emotional intelligence on self-leadership and reported an average emotional intelligence score of 3.63 ± 0.48 points and Shin and Lee's [50] study on emotional intelligence according to enneagram personality type reported an average of 4.70 ± 0.75 points, which are both slightly lower than that of the participants in our study. This is likely due to differences in the nursing students' experience levels as most of the research participants in prior studies were freshmen or students in earlier stages of their nursing program who had not yet developed clinical experience, whereas the participants in our study were third-year students with direct or indirect exposure to caring for high-risk pregnant women from the previous semester through a clinical practicum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Similar results were also found in other studies that measured nursing students' emotional intelligence using the same tool. Kim [49] analyzed the effects of nursing students' metacognition and emotional intelligence on self-leadership and reported an average emotional intelligence score of 3.63 ± 0.48 points and Shin and Lee's [50] study on emotional intelligence according to enneagram personality type reported an average of 4.70 ± 0.75 points, which are both slightly lower than that of the participants in our study. This is likely due to differences in the nursing students' experience levels as most of the research participants in prior studies were freshmen or students in earlier stages of their nursing program who had not yet developed clinical experience, whereas the participants in our study were third-year students with direct or indirect exposure to caring for high-risk pregnant women from the previous semester through a clinical practicum.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…After participating in the program, interpersonal care awareness scores increased significantly in the experimental group, and the program's effect was maintained even after two weeks. Prior to studies of upper elementary school children [9,23], workers [24], nursing students [25], and nurses [26,27] have also found that interpersonal care awareness increases after intervention programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…본 연구에서는 문헌고찰을 통해 변수를 선정하고 동료지지 [20,22] 감성지능 [23][24][25], 윤리적 민감성 [18,26,27], 임상실습교육 환경 [28,29], 의사소통 자기효능감 [30,31] 2).…”
Section: 연구의 가설적 모형unclassified