2010
DOI: 10.1108/17538371011014071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The emergent realities of project praxis in socially complex project environments

Abstract: pub.28/prod.495 Common Ground publishing. pp 141-148 Small, J. (2007). Reconciling an organisation's learning capabiity with knowledge strategy formation in a project/program management setting: A model to bridge the normative and descriptive divide in capacity planning for sustainable advantage. ESC Lille/UTS Doctoral seminar on research in strategy, project and programme management. Lille, France.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
(777 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SSM and rich pictures in particular are now standard action research methods having been used extensively in a range of settings since being developed by Checkland several decades ago. More recently, it has been used to unearth previously hidden cultural aspects of team interaction in investigating a change management project in the Middle East (Small, 2009) and change management in Australia (Sankaran et al, 2009), for studying innovation diffusion and application (Maqsood, 2006) in Australia, for developing competence profiles in human resource management (HRM) in New Zealand (Brocklesby, 1995), studying relationships between project managers and their sponsor in South Africa (Sewchurran and Barron, 2008) and of course widely being used in the UK for studying the application of policy and the hospital sector (Winter, 2009). This takes rich pictures out of the realm of being an exotic and poorly understood research approach to one that is accepted, where its limitations and strengths are now well understood.…”
Section: Research Methodology In Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSM and rich pictures in particular are now standard action research methods having been used extensively in a range of settings since being developed by Checkland several decades ago. More recently, it has been used to unearth previously hidden cultural aspects of team interaction in investigating a change management project in the Middle East (Small, 2009) and change management in Australia (Sankaran et al, 2009), for studying innovation diffusion and application (Maqsood, 2006) in Australia, for developing competence profiles in human resource management (HRM) in New Zealand (Brocklesby, 1995), studying relationships between project managers and their sponsor in South Africa (Sewchurran and Barron, 2008) and of course widely being used in the UK for studying the application of policy and the hospital sector (Winter, 2009). This takes rich pictures out of the realm of being an exotic and poorly understood research approach to one that is accepted, where its limitations and strengths are now well understood.…”
Section: Research Methodology In Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complex projects, with a multitude of stakeholders, the project manager needs to know who the most influential stakeholders are [32]. Project stakeholders with very different world views contribute to the complexity due to differences and diversity in the social-political cultural environment [33]. On the basis of their research, among other things, Karlsen [34] advised project managers to pay more attention to stakeholders.…”
Section: Reducing Risks In Energy Innovation Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern thoughts on project management tend to be more process oriented, thus promoting, in fact, a kind of work-in-progress. For instance, Small and Walker (2009) see project praxis as a social process, which underlines the dynamic character of projects, while in their study on a manufacturing project company, Cicmil and Gaggiotti ponder over the meaning of deadlines. This similarity is rooted, on the one hand, in the ontological status of theatre, which is always in the state of developing or becoming something and not just being something, and, on the other hand, in the fact that, as mentioned before, the rigidity of the 638 IJMPB 8,4 iron triangle is nowadays rejected also in for-profit environment.…”
Section: Refreshing Ideas For Project Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%