2019
DOI: 10.1017/nws.2019.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The embeddedness of social capital in personal networks

Abstract: Name generators (NGs) and position generators (PGs) have been used to measure resources embedded in personal relationships, namely social support and social capital, respectively. Comparisons of these measures adopted NGs that only elicit a small number of alters (max. 5). In this paper we explore whether the measurement of social capital with NGs eliciting larger personal networks (say 15 to 20 alters) gives more comparable results to the PG in terms of occupational prestige. To address this issue, we designe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These networks shape their motivations, social interactions, and choices, introducing a social dimension that extends beyond conventional economic logic (Häuberer, 2011). These networks provide enhanced access to information that would normally be inaccessible (Molina et al, 2020). Social capital, in the form of communication flow, will emanate from these personal ties and distinguish itself from expectations related to traditional business relationships.…”
Section: Social Capital Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These networks shape their motivations, social interactions, and choices, introducing a social dimension that extends beyond conventional economic logic (Häuberer, 2011). These networks provide enhanced access to information that would normally be inaccessible (Molina et al, 2020). Social capital, in the form of communication flow, will emanate from these personal ties and distinguish itself from expectations related to traditional business relationships.…”
Section: Social Capital Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When links among human lives emerge through homophily, fostered by geographical and social proximity (e.g., Fischer & Offer, 2019), resources therefore circulate among individuals under the same cultural and socio‐economic conditions, which exacerbate inequalities through a plurality of mechanisms of social reproduction (see Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1954 on the ‘like‐me hypothesis’; Lin, 2001). 4 It is by means of these fundamental processes that networks incorporate the macro‐system of economic, cultural and social stratification of a given society, thus embedding the inequalities of the historical time and places we inhabit (Carr, 2018; Molina, García‐Macías, Lubbers, & Valenzuela‐Garcia, 2020). More than simple links, networks are structures ordering our individual and social lives by providing opportunities, support, care or empowerment, but also constraints, conflicts, violence or barriers through which we experience our freedom and human agency (Hitlin & Elder, 2007).…”
Section: What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Network?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every time people engage in an interaction, they anticipate gaining something (Homans 1961). The participation of individuals in a social group is premised on the idea that participation somehow adds value to their lives (Molina et al 2020).…”
Section: Social Capital and Women's Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%