2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-006-0106-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elusive inequality-economic growth relationship: are there differences between cities and the countryside?

Abstract: R11, O40, O18, E25,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
56
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…those places with more inequality. Because cities have thick labour markets and agglomeration economies, the positive incentive effects of inequality are found in larger cities, a point confirmed by Fallah and Partridge (2007) using data from the 1990s. Thus, inequality and the associated economic incentives were engines of growth for American cities that helped them become the global leaders in their respective strengths.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…those places with more inequality. Because cities have thick labour markets and agglomeration economies, the positive incentive effects of inequality are found in larger cities, a point confirmed by Fallah and Partridge (2007) using data from the 1990s. Thus, inequality and the associated economic incentives were engines of growth for American cities that helped them become the global leaders in their respective strengths.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Put simply, if you made it big in the US with its high inequality, you had the opportunity for significant returns that are unavailable elsewhere. Indeed, Fallah and Partridge (2007) show that historically, income growth in US metropolitan counties is positively associated with inequality, especially in larger urban areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When using fixed effects, however, if the underlying causal factors in the growth process are persistent, the long-run cross-sectional effects will be subsumed into the fixed effects (Fallah and Partridge 2007). Indeed, as Forbes (2000) highlights, it could be interesting to identify the time-invariant variables, omitted in panel analysis and that could generate the negative bias in the inequality coefficient in cross-country growth regressions, as well as to evaluate the different channels through which inequality, growth, and any other variables are related.…”
Section: The Different Effects Of Inequality On Economic Growth: Litementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This growth-enhancing effect relates to incentives for capital accumulation (Galor 2009) and for innovation (Mirrlees 1971), to incentives to work hard and take risks (WDR 2006), and to agglomeration economies (Fallah and Partridge 2007;CastellsQuintana and Royuela 2011). 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 On the other hand, and again as it happens with the impact of inequality on growth, it seems reasonable to expect that the impact of urbanization on growth is dependent not only on income levels but also on their distribution (which has not yet been empirically considered). First, a certain degree of inequality intensifies the growth-enhancing incentives and agglomeration economies of urban areas -in particular due to better labour market matching and specialization (Fallah and Partridge 2007). 9 However, as Fallah and Partridge highlight, high inequality also weakens social cohesion.…”
Section: 2the Effects Of Agglomeration On Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%