The Elusive Explanation for the Declining Labor Share

Abstract

A vast literature seeks to measure and explain the apparent decline in the labor share in national income that has occurred in recent times in the United States and elsewhere. The culprits include technological change, increased globalization and the rise of China, the enhanced exercise of market power by large firms in concentrated product markets, the decline in unionization rates and the erosion in the bargaining power of workers in labor markets, and the changing composition of the workforce due to a slowdown in population growth and a rise in educational attaintment. We review this literature, with special emphasis on the pitfalls associated with using cross-sectional data to assess this phenomenon and the reasons why the body of papers collectively explains the phenomenon many times over. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Economics, Volume 14 is August 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

A Deep Dive into Tax Buoyancy: Comparing Estimation Techniques in a Large Heterogeneous Panel

“…However, our results differ from those of Lagravinese et al (2020), who, using the DCCE-MG estimator, found long-run buoyancy to be lower than unity, albeit with a slightly different sample of countries and time period studied. A long-term buoyancy greater than one for CIT is consistent with the gradual increase in the share of profits in GDP over the period analyzed (Grossman and Oberfield, 2022;Autor et al, 2020;Karabarbounis and Neiman, 2014).…”

Does Offshoring Shape Labor Market Imperfections? A Comparative Analysis of Belgian and Dutch Firms

“…In doing so, we contribute to the empirical international trade literature. In addition, our study speaks to the growing empirical literature on the determinants of employer monopsony and worker monopoly in rent splitting and the drivers of the falling labor share in income (see Stansbury and Summers (2020), Grossman and Oberfield (2021)).…”

Impact of Energy-Biased Technological Progress on Inclusive Green Growth

“…Most studies of biased technological progress have focused on labor and capital factors. For example, Grossman and Oberfield [18] and Bergholt et al [19] found that technological progress in the U.S. manifested itself as capital-biased technological progress due to greater automation of production processes. For the measurement of biased technological progress, the following methods are available.…”