2020
DOI: 10.15868/socialsector.37787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Elements: Transforming Teaching through Curriculum-Based Professional Learning

Abstract: This publication was edited by Kathleen Carroll, designed by JamesMcKibben, and produced under the leadership of the Corporation's

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this ambitious vision can present challenges for MLs, particularly given the language‐intensive nature of science and engineering practices (Hakuta et al, 2013), science classrooms that embrace this vision can also be ideal contexts for language learning, as they reflect contemporary theoretical perspectives that emphasize purposeful communication in classroom communities using language and other semiotic modalities (see previous section). In the decade since the release of the Framework and the NGSS, implementation efforts have been underway, with key priorities being curriculum design and professional learning (Campbell & Lee, 2021; Reiser et al, 2021; Short & Hirsch, 2020). Some of these efforts have focused specifically on curriculum design and professional learning that leverage the strengths and meet the needs of MLs in linguistically diverse science classrooms (e.g., Haas et al, 2021; Lee et al, 2019; Miller et al, 2021; Pierson & Grapin, 2021).…”
Section: Recent Developments In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this ambitious vision can present challenges for MLs, particularly given the language‐intensive nature of science and engineering practices (Hakuta et al, 2013), science classrooms that embrace this vision can also be ideal contexts for language learning, as they reflect contemporary theoretical perspectives that emphasize purposeful communication in classroom communities using language and other semiotic modalities (see previous section). In the decade since the release of the Framework and the NGSS, implementation efforts have been underway, with key priorities being curriculum design and professional learning (Campbell & Lee, 2021; Reiser et al, 2021; Short & Hirsch, 2020). Some of these efforts have focused specifically on curriculum design and professional learning that leverage the strengths and meet the needs of MLs in linguistically diverse science classrooms (e.g., Haas et al, 2021; Lee et al, 2019; Miller et al, 2021; Pierson & Grapin, 2021).…”
Section: Recent Developments In Science Education With Mlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the curriculum materials were designed to be educative, that is, “to promote teacher learning in addition to student learning” (Davis & Krajcik, 2005, p. 3). Thus, the materials were designed to be an important source of teacher professional learning in their own right (Ball & Cohen, 1996; Hill et al, 2020; Short & Hirsh, 2020). Second, our efforts to iteratively develop and revise the curriculum over 3 years were guided, in large part, by the successes and challenges that teachers experienced as they implemented the materials in their classrooms and the feedback they provided at teacher advisory board meetings.…”
Section: Our Previous Curriculum Development Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 That said, the research suggests that many teachers do not participate in robust curriculum-based professional learning. A 2019 study highlighted that, on average, teachers received only 1 to 2 days of professional learning tailored to specific instructional materials, 28 and a recent analysis by RAND Corporation indicates that 22.8% of teachers reported receiving no professional learning on how to implement classroom materials, 37.7% received just 1 to 5 hours, and only 9.8% received more than 20 hours. 29 Teachers report that the quality of the professional learning they receive is low, with half indicating that their preparation for teaching "did not prepare…”
Section: Curriculum-based Professional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%