1956
DOI: 10.2307/2871950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Element of Art in Gibbon's History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gibbon exhibits no defensiveness about "the natural historical order," still less any minimizing of time's role in arrangement, least of all any recommendation of anachrony as the inherently superior "method." (Gibbon would accordingly not thank his own analysts, e.g., Keast [1956], for dissociating the art of Decline and Fall from its chronology.) On the contrary, he sees no reason why the in-medias-res rule should govern epic composition itself.…”
Section: Chronologically (Lazarillo Winds Up By Opening a Gap About mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gibbon exhibits no defensiveness about "the natural historical order," still less any minimizing of time's role in arrangement, least of all any recommendation of anachrony as the inherently superior "method." (Gibbon would accordingly not thank his own analysts, e.g., Keast [1956], for dissociating the art of Decline and Fall from its chronology.) On the contrary, he sees no reason why the in-medias-res rule should govern epic composition itself.…”
Section: Chronologically (Lazarillo Winds Up By Opening a Gap About mentioning
confidence: 97%