2002
DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2002-10007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrostatic persistence length of polymers beyond the OSF limit

Abstract: Abstract. We use large scale Monte Carlo simulations to test scaling theories for the electrostatic persistence length le of isolated, uniformly charged polymers with Debye-Hückel intrachain interactions in the limit where the screening length κ −1 exceeds the intrinsic persistence length of the chains. Our simulations cover a significantly larger part of the parameter space than previous studies. We observe no significant deviations from the prediction le ∝ κ −2 by Khokhlov and Khachaturian which is based on … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
117
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(86 reference statements)
9
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 This picture, formally equivalent to the Barrat-Joanny model, 58 was motivated by a variety of simulation results that indicated flexible chains are not well-described by a single persistence length over all scales, but rather by a dual-regime picture in which the chain has some short-length-scale flexibility that is relatively unaffected by electrostatics, followed by a long-length-scale structure that is stiffened by electrostatic repulsion. [59][60][61][62][63] The crossover between these scales appears, in simulations, to vary linearly with Debye length, 63 in agreement with the single-chain elasticity experiments on ssNAs. 19,22 Further confirmation of this picture arises from the anomalous elasticity of ssNAs in the high force ( f > k B T/ℓ) regime, which do not follow the WLC prediction, Eq.…”
Section: A Ssnas and Polyelectrolyte Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…58 This picture, formally equivalent to the Barrat-Joanny model, 58 was motivated by a variety of simulation results that indicated flexible chains are not well-described by a single persistence length over all scales, but rather by a dual-regime picture in which the chain has some short-length-scale flexibility that is relatively unaffected by electrostatics, followed by a long-length-scale structure that is stiffened by electrostatic repulsion. [59][60][61][62][63] The crossover between these scales appears, in simulations, to vary linearly with Debye length, 63 in agreement with the single-chain elasticity experiments on ssNAs. 19,22 Further confirmation of this picture arises from the anomalous elasticity of ssNAs in the high force ( f > k B T/ℓ) regime, which do not follow the WLC prediction, Eq.…”
Section: A Ssnas and Polyelectrolyte Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These include the electrostatic behavior of chains whose non-electrostatic stiffness lies between that of single-and double-stranded DNA, and the behavior of weakly charged chains, about which theoretical work has already posited a range of structural regimes. 59,70 Finally, single-molecule methods are not limited to determining charged polymer structure; other complex structures, e.g., including branched or bottle brush configurations, are likely to be productive targets with these methods. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NCPs are known to be stable only in a limited range of [simple salt] close to B0.1 M. 289 At smaller [salt] the DNA becomes stiffer due to ES contribution to its bending persistence length, 290,291 see also ref. [292][293][294][295][296]. At high [salt], on the other hand, the ES DNA-(histone core) affinity is attenuated by screening.…”
Section: Dna Wrapping In Ncpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theoretical models, l P is divided into intrinsic l P 0 and electrostatic l P el components, l P ϭ l P 0 ϩ l P el . In Odijk-Skolnick-Fixman theory for charged wormlike chains (2) and some extensions to flexible polymers (34,35), l P el ϰ I Ϫ1 , where I is the ionic strength (dotted lines). Others predict l P el ϰ I Ϫ1/2 (solid lines) (36,37).…”
Section: And 4; See Sample Preparation and Characterization Inmentioning
confidence: 99%