2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.618549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Electrophysiological Correlates of Phoneme Perception in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Preliminary Case Series

Abstract: Aims: This study aimed to investigate phoneme perception in patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) by using the event-related potential (ERP) technique. These ERP components might contribute to the diagnostic process of PPA and its clinical variants (NFV: nonfluent variant, SV: semantic variant, LV: logopenic variant) and reveal insights about phoneme perception processes in these patients.Method: Phoneme discrimination and categorization processes were investigated by the mismatch negativity (MMN) an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Noise-vocoding fundamentally reduces the availability of acoustic cues that define phonemes as auditory objects: impaired recognition of these degraded auditory objects could in principle result from deficient encoding of acoustic features, damaged object-level representations (the auditory analogue of 'apperceptive' deficits in the visual domain) or impaired top-down, predictive disambiguation based on stored knowledge about speech signal characteristics. In AD and lvPPA, a core deficit of object-level representations has been demonstrated neuropsychologically and electrophysiologically using other procedures that alter acoustic detail in phonemes and nonverbal sounds 29,31,68,69 ; it is therefore plausible that an analogous apperceptive deficit may have impacted the recognition of noise-vocoded phonemes in the AD and lvPPA groups here. In nfvPPA, one previous study of noise-vocoded speech perception has foregrounded the role of inflexible top-down predictive decoding mechanisms instantiated in frontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…2 Noise-vocoding fundamentally reduces the availability of acoustic cues that define phonemes as auditory objects: impaired recognition of these degraded auditory objects could in principle result from deficient encoding of acoustic features, damaged object-level representations (the auditory analogue of 'apperceptive' deficits in the visual domain) or impaired top-down, predictive disambiguation based on stored knowledge about speech signal characteristics. In AD and lvPPA, a core deficit of object-level representations has been demonstrated neuropsychologically and electrophysiologically using other procedures that alter acoustic detail in phonemes and nonverbal sounds 29,31,68,69 ; it is therefore plausible that an analogous apperceptive deficit may have impacted the recognition of noise-vocoded phonemes in the AD and lvPPA groups here. In nfvPPA, one previous study of noise-vocoded speech perception has foregrounded the role of inflexible top-down predictive decoding mechanisms instantiated in frontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The electrophysiological test battery consisted of five linguistic ERP paradigms ( Cocquyt et al, 2021 ; Stalpaert et al, 2021a , b ; Stalpaert et al, under review) 1 . At the initial evaluation, the five paradigms of the test battery were administered randomly in one session in each patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auditory oddball paradigm of Stalpaert et al (2021b) consisted of 600 standard and 150 deviant stimuli with a stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 500 ms. The standard stimulus [bƏ] differed from the deviant stimulus [gƏ] by one phonemic contrast, namely the place of articulation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…P3b), depending on the task instructions (MMN: unattentive, P300: attentive). For such paradigms, the MMN reflects phoneme discrimination (Näätänen, 2001; Näätänen & Alho, 1997; Stalpaert et al, 2021), whereas the P300 reflects phoneme categorisation (Kok, 2001; Stalpaert et al, 2021). The most investigated linguistic ERP, however, is the N400.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%