1938
DOI: 10.1021/ja01279a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Electron Diffraction Investigation of the Molecular Structures of Hydrogen Disulfide, Dimethyl Disulfide and Sulfur Dichloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1939
1939
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the C-S bond distance is insignificantly shorter than that of 1.81 /i given in the table of covalent radii (Pauling, 1942, p. 164), our value is the same as that found in the electron-diffraction studies of dimethyl disulfide (Stevenson & Beach, 1938) and dimethyl trisulfide (Donohue & Schomaker, 1948), and is greater than that found in thiophene (Schomaker & Pauhng, 1939). We cannot be sure that the observed C=C distance is really significantly shorter than the 'normal' C =C distance because of our relatively large probable errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Although the C-S bond distance is insignificantly shorter than that of 1.81 /i given in the table of covalent radii (Pauling, 1942, p. 164), our value is the same as that found in the electron-diffraction studies of dimethyl disulfide (Stevenson & Beach, 1938) and dimethyl trisulfide (Donohue & Schomaker, 1948), and is greater than that found in thiophene (Schomaker & Pauhng, 1939). We cannot be sure that the observed C=C distance is really significantly shorter than the 'normal' C =C distance because of our relatively large probable errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…2.04 A in formamidinium disulphide ion J Foss, Johnsen & Tverdten, 1958) ide and dithiolanecarboxylic acid, 2.09 and 2.10, Foss & Tjmosland, 1958a, b). The mean value of the angles SSC (98°), as could be expected, is intermediate between the angles found in non-cyclic disulphides (dimethyl disulphide, 107 °, Stevenson & Beach, 1938;bistrifluoromethyl disulphide, 105 °, Bowen, 1954; formamidinium disulphide ion, 104 °, Foss et al, 1958) and those in five-membered cyclic disulphides (e.g. 92 ° in thiuret disulphide ion).…”
Section: Conformation and Configurationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…118.7 1-3 C(4)--C(5)--C(6) 120.9 1.5 C(5)--C(6)--C (7) 120.1 1.4 C(6)--C(7)--C(2) 119-3 1-1 C(8)--C(9)--C(10) 119.7 1-2 C(8)--C(9)--C (14) 122-1 1.2 C(10)-C(9)-- C(14) 117.9 1.2 C(9)--C(10)-C(11) 117-8 1.2 C(10)-C(ll)- C(12) 123-4 1.3 C(11)-C(12)- C(13) 116.9 1-3 C(12)-C(13), C(14) 120.5 1-5 C(13)-C(14)- C(9) 123-3 1-3 calculated by the method of Schomaker, Waser, Marsh & Bergman (1959) and are given in Table 8. The central part of the molecule C(1)--S(1)-S(2)-C(8) adopts a skewed non-planar configuration like that found in hydrogen peroxide (Abrahams, Collin & Lipscomb, 1951), hydrogen disulphide (Stevenson & Beach, 1938;Wilson & Badger, 1949), dimethyl disulphide (Stevenson & Beach, 1938) and diphenyl disulphide (Lee & Bryant, 1969). The observed S-S bond length of 2.02/~ may have 23 % of double bond character if the Pauling (1960) value of 2.08 A is taken as the length of a pure single bond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%