Summary. Conduction block by thiol reagents is potentiated by repeated, brief electrical stimulation. These studies have been quantitated with N-ethylmaleimide and mercurochrome showing a nonlinear relationship between dose and number of stimuli required to produce inexcitability, p-Chloromercuribenzoate, mercurochrome and fluorescein mercuric acetate block conduction and are reversible with /~-mercaptoethanol and exhibit the "stimulation effect." N-Ethylmaleimide, Ellman's reagent (DTNB), and 2-dimethylaminoethyl selenolbenzoate exhibit the "stimulation effect", but blockade is irreversible. In a series of local anesthetics, procaine, 2-diethylaminoethyl thiolbenzoate, and 2-dimethylaminoethyl selenolbenzoate, only the selenolester reacts with SH groups and shows a "stimulation effect". Iodoacetate and iodoacetamide block nerve conduction without a stimulation effect. Possible interpretations of this effect include: altered permeability, unmasking of buried SH groups in the membrane, or electrolytic reduction of disulfides.Extensive work has been conducted in recent years to show that conformational changes occur in nerve membranes during the conduction of the nerve impulse [4,30,31]. It was proposed in 1952 that alterations in ion permeability in electrically excitable membranes involve a conformational change triggered by the attachment of acetylcholine to a protein, the "acetylcholine receptor" [22]. Since then, many laboratories have attempted to isolate the "acetylcholine-receptor" biopolymers from a variety of sources [14] and have provided evidence that proteins are major components of the receptor molecules in all cases studied, although it must be assumed that other biopolymers are involved in the functions of the intact system.