1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00624055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electro-optic kerr effect in noncentrosymmetric KH2PO4 and KD2PO4 monocrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Closer inspection of the results published in the literature reveals that they may be divided into two separate sets that differ by a factor of ϳ100. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Of the values obtained by different methods, those derived earlier by static means are of order of magnitude 10 Ϫ18 m 2 V Ϫ2 and are larger than the equivalent dynamic values. The difference in these results cannot be explained in terms of either measurement error or a dependence of the coefficients on temperature, wavelength, or the frequency of the modulating field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Closer inspection of the results published in the literature reveals that they may be divided into two separate sets that differ by a factor of ϳ100. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Of the values obtained by different methods, those derived earlier by static means are of order of magnitude 10 Ϫ18 m 2 V Ϫ2 and are larger than the equivalent dynamic values. The difference in these results cannot be explained in terms of either measurement error or a dependence of the coefficients on temperature, wavelength, or the frequency of the modulating field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Such data for both KDP and ADP have been tabulated 4 and the discrepancy in results noted by a number of authors. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] As an example, values given by Perfilova and Sonin 5 for KDP are (in units of m 2 V Ϫ2 ) ͉ g xxxx Ϫ g yyxx ͉ ϭ 2.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ18 and ͉n o 3 g xxxx Ϫ n e 3 g zzxx ͉ ϭ 13.5 ϫ 10 Ϫ18 ; the corresponding ones for ADP are 1.7 ϫ 10 Ϫ18 and 16.5 ϫ 10 Ϫ18 . In contrast, other authors 6,7 quote for KDP (in units of m 2 V Ϫ2 ), ͉ g xxxx Ϫ g yyxx ͉ ϭ 2.5 ϫ 10 Ϫ20 and n o 3 g xxxx Ϫ n e 3 g zzxx ϭ Ϫ12 ϫ 10 Ϫ20 , and for ADP, ͉ g xxxx Ϫ g yyxx ͉ ϭ 4.7 ϫ 10 Ϫ20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r 123 À10X3 to 10X5 Â 10 À12 V/m and r 123 À26X4 Â 10 À12 V/m along with e 3 0 20X8 and e 3 0 50, for KDP and DKDP, respectively, one observes that the intrinsic coefficient m 123 in these crystals is nearly equal. Following (6), assuming an analogous rough constancy of M 1111 À M 2211 and using e 1 0 43X2 (KDP) and e 1 0 57 to 63 (DKDP) [14], one expects jg 1111 À g 2211 j in DKDP to be almost twice larger than that for KDP. Our measurements are in contradiction with such prediction and show that for the electric fields applied along the [001] and [100] directions the nature of the electrooptic effect is different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the quadratic EO materials can be integrated and have already been used in microelectronics and for optical waveguide components [1]. The Kerr effect is very weak in most materials, with the quadric electrooptical (QEO) coefficient (R) value of w10 À18wÀ20 m 2 V À2 [2,3]. But it is significantly large in ferroelectrics just above the Curie temperature (T c ) or the morphotropic phase boundary, which takes advantage of the phase transition [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%