1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf01615815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrical conductivity of eclogites measured by two methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conductivity results on eclogite are in the good agreement with those of Laštovičková (1975), although a small discrepancy in the lower-temperature region may reflect the different mineralogical constituents of the two studies. The natural eclogite sample used by Laštovičková (1975) consisted of garnet (40%), clinopyroxene (45%), quartz (10%), amphibole (2%), rutile (2%), and minor symplectite minerals that include amphibole-plagioclase, diopside-plagioclase, and diopside-magnetite (1%). In the present study, in contrast, the samples consisted of varying volume ratios of garnet and clinopyroxene.…”
Section: Geophysical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our conductivity results on eclogite are in the good agreement with those of Laštovičková (1975), although a small discrepancy in the lower-temperature region may reflect the different mineralogical constituents of the two studies. The natural eclogite sample used by Laštovičková (1975) consisted of garnet (40%), clinopyroxene (45%), quartz (10%), amphibole (2%), rutile (2%), and minor symplectite minerals that include amphibole-plagioclase, diopside-plagioclase, and diopside-magnetite (1%). In the present study, in contrast, the samples consisted of varying volume ratios of garnet and clinopyroxene.…”
Section: Geophysical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The clinopyroxene data are fromYang et al (2011a). The dashed line shows the electrical conductivity of eclogite during cooling at room pressure, as reported byLaštovičková (1975) Fig. 11Effect of garnet fraction on electrical conductivity of eclogite at conditions of 2.0 GPa, 873-1473 K and theNi-…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[44] The temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity of eclogite samples is presented in Figure 7, and those of spinel lherzolite and mafic granulite samples are shown in Figure 8. The conductivity of At-Bashi eclogite measured in the laboratory compares well with the previous measurements by Laštovičková [1975], Laštovičková and Parkhomenko [1976], and Parkhomenko [1982]. The activation energy, ∼0.8 eV, and the absolute value of the electrical conductivity are slightly higher than in upper mantle eclogites.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Electrical conductivity of At‐Bashi eclogite measured at 2.5 GPa in comparison with MT‐inversion conductivity. The average activation energy of At‐Bashi eclogite at 0.83 eV is in good agreement with the typical values of 0.66–1.00 eV [ Laštovičková , 1975]. Max and min are the upper and lower boundaries of eclogite conductivities for garnet‐rich (>40 vol%) and garnet‐poor (<20 vol%) eclogites [ Laštovičková and Parkhomenko , 1976], respectively.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Deformation during craton assembly might be one means of shearing the grains and establishing connectivity. However, there is almost no extant laboratory data on the bulk conductivity of eclogites, and what does exist does not show high conductivities [ Lastovickova and Buben , 1975].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%