2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-015-0611-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Elastic Coefficients of Double-Porosity Materials: A Revisit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Wilson & Aifantis, 1982) proposed effective parameters based on the Skempton coefficient: bm=K*K()1KKs,1embf=1K*K, where K*, K, and Ks are the bulk moduli of fractured rock, intact porous matrix and solid grains, respectively (Bai, 1999). Alternative models to compute effective parameters for dual‐porosity poroelastic media haven been proposed by (Berryman & Pride, 2002) and by (Zheng et al., 2016).…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Wilson & Aifantis, 1982) proposed effective parameters based on the Skempton coefficient: bm=K*K()1KKs,1embf=1K*K, where K*, K, and Ks are the bulk moduli of fractured rock, intact porous matrix and solid grains, respectively (Bai, 1999). Alternative models to compute effective parameters for dual‐porosity poroelastic media haven been proposed by (Berryman & Pride, 2002) and by (Zheng et al., 2016).…”
Section: Background and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuum equivalent theories date back to Barenblatt's dual‐porosity concept (Barenblatt et al., 1960), in which the porous matrix blocks and the fractures are envisioned as two separate continua in terms of flow, but linked through the fluid exchange between the matrix blocks and secondary fractures. In the context of poroelasticity, this is the so‐called dual‐porosity poroelasticity (DPP) paradigm (Bai et al., 1993; Elsworth & Bai, 1992; Wilson & Aifantis, 1982), thoroughly analyzed by (Berryman & Wang, 1995), (Berryman & Pride, 2002), and (Bai, 1999), and recently revisited by (Mehrabian & Abousleiman, 2014), (Zheng et al., 2016), and (Presho et al., 2011). Analogous to the double‐porosity concept for solute and heat transfer, DPP recognizes nonequilibrium in deforming fractured media: the possibility that, over short timescales, pressures may be different in the rock matrix and fracture system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear constitutive relations among stress, strain, fluid content, and pore pressure for isotropic materials with double‐porosity can be written in the form σij=[],(),b112true/3μeb12p1b13p2δij+2μεij, ζ1=b12e+b22p1b23p2, ζ2=b13eb23p1+b33p2, where σ ij is the stress tensor; p 1 and p 2 are the pore pressures in the matrix and fracture; ζ 1 and ζ 2 are the increment of fluid content in the matrix and fracture; e ≡ ∂ V / V is the volume strain; εij12(),ui,j+uj,i, with u i being solid displacement, is the stain tensor; μ is the shear modulus; b 11 , b 12 , b 13 , b 22 , b 23 , and b 33 are six independent coefficients, whose dependence on the material constants, such as the drained bulk modulus K and the pore fluid bulk modulus K f , are summarized in Appendix A.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poromechanic theories provide new ways to study porous materials whose mechanical behavior is influenced by the pore fluid (Coussy 2004). In fact, poromechanic methods have been successfully used to study most aspects of mechanical behavior and durability of CBPMs, e.g., multi-scale mechanical properties (Ulm et al 2004), drying shrinkages (Rougelot et al 2009), alkaline silica reactions (Multon and Sellier 2016), freezing-thawing swellings (Sun and Scherer 2010;Zeng 2011;Zeng et al 2011Zeng et al , 2014bZeng et al , 2014cZeng et al , 2016Wang et al 2014) and multiphase transport in other porous media (Boxberg et al 2015;Zheng et al 2016). Furthermore, poromechanic framework is robust to combine physical and/or chemical mechanisms, by which a porous material shows different properties (Coussy 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%