2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elastic behavior of aluminum alloy foam under uniaxial loading and bending conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism has been extensively studied for foam materials, which also exhibit a kink in their stress-strain dependence, showing a low stress dependence at low pressure and bulk-like behavior at high pressure [29][30][31] . In fact, qualitatively the change in slope in with a simple model that assumes the pressure to be isotropic in the substrate and the film to be experiencing a reduced in plane pressure due strain relaxation within boundaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism has been extensively studied for foam materials, which also exhibit a kink in their stress-strain dependence, showing a low stress dependence at low pressure and bulk-like behavior at high pressure [29][30][31] . In fact, qualitatively the change in slope in with a simple model that assumes the pressure to be isotropic in the substrate and the film to be experiencing a reduced in plane pressure due strain relaxation within boundaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured compressive force-displacement of the testing machine was fitted using a power function to facilitate the elimination of the machine compliance from the cross-head displacement recorded during the compression test. It has been demonstrated that such a method is convenient and accurate for the measurement of elastic modulus of aluminium foams, with accuracy similar to that based on laser displacement sensor (Triawan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions and relative densities of the prepared samples are presented in Table 1. The average cell size is 2.8-4.5 mm for Alporas foam with relative density ranging from 6.5% to 12.8% (Miyoshi et al, 2000;Sugimura et al, 1997;Triawan et al, 2012) and the potential effect of the number of cells in a sample on measured bulk properties can be neglected for the dimensions of the prepared samples, particularly for the samples with a height of 40 mm (Jeon and Asahina, 2005).…”
Section: Closed-cell Aluminium Foammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the mechanical parameters affecting the performance of AF and PU, respectively, also affect the mechanical behavior and structural stability of AF-PU composites. Different relative densities and pore size are two main factors influencing mechanical behavior of AF [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and the usual influence parameters on the absorbed mechanical energy of PU are frequency, temperature and vibration amplitude [20][21][22][23][24]. In order to understand what kind of AF-PU materials are the most suitable for applying hysteretic damping devices in seismic resistant buildings, we will investigate the damping capacity of AF-PU composites with different corresponding porosity and pore size under different cycling frequency, vibration amplitude, temperature aging and cycle numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%