1993
DOI: 10.1002/app.1993.070480502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elastic and plastic mechanical responses of microcellular foams

Abstract: SYNOPSISMicrocellular foams were prepared by the thermally induced phase-separation technique, which yields materials having very small cell dimensions (0.1-20 pm) . The polymers employed were isotactic polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, poly (4-methyl-l-pentene), polyurethane, and Lycram and the resulting foams all had densities in the range 0.04-0.27 g ~m -~. Values of Young's modulus and the collapse stress for these foams were measured and compared with predictions for conventional foams containing defects. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 and Table II show that, with a decrease in the relative density, the tensile strengths, the tensile moduli, and the elongation all decreased, as expected. Unfortunately, until now, there were only very limited data reported on the mechanical properties of such microcellular foams 11, 23, 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 and Table II show that, with a decrease in the relative density, the tensile strengths, the tensile moduli, and the elongation all decreased, as expected. Unfortunately, until now, there were only very limited data reported on the mechanical properties of such microcellular foams 11, 23, 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that the filler properties and content percent great affect the part impact strength. And SCF has no effect on the fillers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Figure 1-5 shows the bend strength, tensile strength and impact strength of PBT (30% GF) on the solid polymer and different weight reduction ratio.…”
Section: Part Mechanical Properitesmentioning
confidence: 99%