2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00024-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The El Salvador earthquakes of January and February 2001: context, characteristics and implications for seismic risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our preferred fault plane with strike, dip, and rake of 297°, 58°, −93° respectively, is consistent with the Harvard CMT or ERI determinations but our centroid depth is shallower, around 47 km. We find that little rupture occurred above 25 km depth, which is consistent with both the intraplate nature of this event and the very weak or even absent tsunami observed in the Pacific Ocean [ Bommer et al , 2002]. Rupture propagated mostly updip and toward the northwest resulting in a 50 km wide by 25 km along‐dip zone of high moment release (Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our preferred fault plane with strike, dip, and rake of 297°, 58°, −93° respectively, is consistent with the Harvard CMT or ERI determinations but our centroid depth is shallower, around 47 km. We find that little rupture occurred above 25 km depth, which is consistent with both the intraplate nature of this event and the very weak or even absent tsunami observed in the Pacific Ocean [ Bommer et al , 2002]. Rupture propagated mostly updip and toward the northwest resulting in a 50 km wide by 25 km along‐dip zone of high moment release (Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The number of deaths might have been even greater if the event had occurred during the wet season when landslides are more easily triggered. A detailed report of this earthquake as well as the following shallow inland M = 6.6 earthquake (13 February 2001) is given by Bommer et al [2002]. Large intraplate earthquakes in subduction zones are quite common although very few have reached the magnitude of the January 2001 earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most structures of this type did not sustain any damage, or suffered very slight damage, whilst adjacent adobe houses collapsed (Fig. 15d), a pattern of damage which had been previously observed following the 2001 El Salvador earthquake (Bommer et al 2002). The good performance of RC-confined masonry structures may be related to local construction practices, which ensure that brick walls and reinforced concrete elements have solid joints.…”
Section: Observations Of Structural Damage In the Light Of Local Consmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The economic and social consequences for the affected region of the Pisco earthquake were nevertheless severe, and therefore further investigations into the nature of ground motions from subduction-zone earthquakes are justified. There are furthermore strong reasons to believe that the ground motions from crustal and subduction events are fundamentally different in nature, not least because of differences in the magnitude and distance ranges considered, but also as a result of differences in duration and the rate of energy release (e.g., Bommer et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate their rupture parameters (slip and rupture size), based on the CMT catalogue and scaling laws (Wells & Coppersmith 1994). For 2001, M w = 7.7 earthquake in El Salvador in particular, these parameters are given by Bommer et al (2002) and Vallée et al (2003). We use an elastic half‐space model (Okada 1985) to estimate the cumulative coseismic displacements associated with the selected earthquakes at each GPS site (Tables S2 and S3), and take them into account during the GLOBK combination process.…”
Section: Data and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%