1980
DOI: 10.1137/0511073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Eigenvalues of an Equilateral Triangle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
60
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For proofs, see the recent exposition (including completeness) by McCartin [26], building on work of Práger [33]. A different approach is due to Pinsky [30].…”
Section: Eigenfunctions Of the Equilateral Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For proofs, see the recent exposition (including completeness) by McCartin [26], building on work of Práger [33]. A different approach is due to Pinsky [30].…”
Section: Eigenfunctions Of the Equilateral Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The title of the article refers to the problem which was solved in [20] for an equilateral triangle, which is the fundamental domain of the affine Weyl group W aff , corresponding to the simple Lie algebra A 2 and to the compact group SU (3). Through the use of an entirely different method [21], orbit functions provide a solution to this problem for any compact simple Lie group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues and the eigenfunctions in (3.1) and (3.3) are the direct consequences of Pinsky [11]. Then for the 3-dimensional case, we obtain (3.2) and (3.4) by applying the separation of variable method.…”
Section: Then the Eigenvalues And The Eigenfunctions Of-a For Diricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700036314 [11] Spatial averaging for inertial manifolds 135 DEFINITION. For a given (bounded Lipschitz) domain ficS",n<3, and choice of boundary conditions for the Laplacian, we say the weaker principle of spatial averaging holds if there exists a quantity £ > 0 such that for every e > 0, K > 0 and any bounded subset SB C H 2 , there exists arbitrarily large k = k(S8) > K, such that The main difference between the weaker PSA and PSA is the choice of k and the upper bound of the estimate (4.10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%