2018
DOI: 10.1109/lca.2017.2777834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EH Model: Analytical Exploration of Energy-Harvesting Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy cost of a checkpoint is the product of the average number of bytes it contains d b and the energy cost of writing and reading a byte of data e b . As prior work [2], [3], we find that backup and restore costs are nearly perfectly linear in the number of bytes that needs to be read or written. Idle: ULP-systems use sleep modes, which are low-energy states where selected components are either power-gated or clock-gated, to save energy while idle.…”
Section: The Pes Modelsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy cost of a checkpoint is the product of the average number of bytes it contains d b and the energy cost of writing and reading a byte of data e b . As prior work [2], [3], we find that backup and restore costs are nearly perfectly linear in the number of bytes that needs to be read or written. Idle: ULP-systems use sleep modes, which are low-energy states where selected components are either power-gated or clock-gated, to save energy while idle.…”
Section: The Pes Modelsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our Periodic Energy-Harvesting Systems (PES) model enables IoT developers to select sustainable near-energy-neutral design points by faithfully modeling the energy consumption of computation and communication. In contrast, the state-of-theart EH-model [2], [3] only models computation and backup; backups have a high energy cost in communicating systems because the connection to the back-end system needs to be reestablished when power returns. Across our IoT applications, PES predicts energy consumption with an average error of 0.5% (maximally 1.4%) relative to our real-hardware baseline and simulator for energy-feasible and intermittent design points, respectively.…”
Section: Resume Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy consumption evaluation requires precise measurements and a model of the platform. For ultra-low power systems, allowing intermittent execution, a variety of models has been proposed [22]- [24]. The EPIC modeling tool [25] supports temperature variation and clock drifts in power consumption estimation.…”
Section: Context and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, equally important are the work before and after the modeling stage. Early on, analytical models like EH-Model [15] can be used to rapidly explore the design space. Tools like Ekho [3] and Shepherd [16] aid the designer throughout the design flow by providing a means for accurate power profiling (research and survey) and replaying the traces during modeling and/or hardware validation.…”
Section: Model-based Batteryless Eh-wsn Designmentioning
confidence: 99%