2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Egyptian hepatitis C programme: A model of HCV treatment intervention?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New pan‐genotypic DAA regimens may remove the need for HCV genotype testing prior to treatment initiation, particularly for people who are DAA treatment naive and do not have cirrhosis, which would further enhance progression through the care cascade and facilitate rapid treatment initiation strategies, especially where Point of Care HCV RNA tests are available. Removal of HCV genotype testing prior to treatment initiation has been suggested to be particularly beneficial for improving treatment initiation in resource‐limited settings where burden of disease is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New pan‐genotypic DAA regimens may remove the need for HCV genotype testing prior to treatment initiation, particularly for people who are DAA treatment naive and do not have cirrhosis, which would further enhance progression through the care cascade and facilitate rapid treatment initiation strategies, especially where Point of Care HCV RNA tests are available. Removal of HCV genotype testing prior to treatment initiation has been suggested to be particularly beneficial for improving treatment initiation in resource‐limited settings where burden of disease is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the overall prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in the most recent EHIS 2015 [13] study, which was 9.9%. All screened participants who were positive for anti-HCV were tested for HCV RNA at the Luxor center and if positive received treatment without prioritization [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, Egypt negotiated with Gilead Sciences a reduced access price for sofosbuvir at $900 for 12 weeks of treatment (Donald, 2015), and this was followed by a reduced price of simeprevir from Janssen and daclatasvir from Bristol Meyers Squibb (BMS) at $750 for 12 weeks of treatment. However, the cost of treatment with SOF plus PEG or simeprevir or DCV was beyond the affordability of the national program that planned to treat more than 350,000 patients a year (Waked et al, 2014;WHO, 2018), and with scale up of the program by the end of 2015, the only option to treat the necessary number of patients to adhere to the disease elimination plan targets was to introduce low-cost generics (Lemoine and Cooke, 2018;Elsharkawy et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%