2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficient rotational pressure-correction schemes for the coupling Stokes/Darcy problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, 4, 5 and 6, the fluid in the matrix domain does not directly communicate with the wellbore. From the streamlines in these pictures, the fluid is flowing from the matrix to the microfractures nearby, and then from microfractures to the vertical production wellbore, which is consistent with the literatures [31,33,36,53]. Left: the pressure in the microfractures and conduits; Right: the pressure in the matrix this method is a combination of domain decomposition method and the modified characteristic finite element method, which derives a decoupled and fully discrete parallel scheme without nonlinear term.…”
Section: Examplesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…3, 4, 5 and 6, the fluid in the matrix domain does not directly communicate with the wellbore. From the streamlines in these pictures, the fluid is flowing from the matrix to the microfractures nearby, and then from microfractures to the vertical production wellbore, which is consistent with the literatures [31,33,36,53]. Left: the pressure in the microfractures and conduits; Right: the pressure in the matrix this method is a combination of domain decomposition method and the modified characteristic finite element method, which derives a decoupled and fully discrete parallel scheme without nonlinear term.…”
Section: Examplesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, we achieve a series of numerical results for the presented problem [21][22][23]. Furthermore, we will then use the efficient methods [18,34,35,37] to solve the similar practical problem for the coupling problem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the weak formulation of the dual-porosity-Navier-Stokes model (2.1)-(2.12) as follows [31][32][33][34][35][36]. we suppose ⃗ f s ∈ H −1 (Ω s ) and f d ∈ L 2 (Ω d ).…”
Section: Preliminaries Weak Formulations and Finite Element Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trace inequality: There exists a positive constant C T depending on the domain Ω s such that for all truevsYs, we have truevsL2false(double-struckIfalse)CTtruevs012vs012. Then, the weak formulation of the dual‐porosity‐Navier–Stokes model (2.1)–(2.12) as follows [31–36]. we suppose truefsH1false(Ωsfalse) and f d ∈ L 2 (Ω d ).…”
Section: Preliminaries Weak Formulations and Finite Element Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%