1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80335-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficiency of Sensory Information Coding by Mechanoreceptor Neurons

Abstract: Most sensory systems encode external signals into action potentials for transmission to the central nervous system, but little is known about the cost or efficiency of this encoding. We measured the information capacity at three stages of encoding in the neurons of a spider slit-sense mechanoreceptor organ. For the receptor current under voltage clamp, the capacity was approximately 1400 bits/s, but when the neuron was allowed to generate a receptor potential, nonlinear membrane processes improved the capacity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The constant value of R within each group of experiments probably means that the sensory neurons all have similar general structure and function, with approximately the same noise level, and similar nonlinear contributions from stages such as action-potential encoding. The range of information capacity values (ϳ3-15 Bits/s) is lower than the value of ϳ200 Bits/s typically observed in spiking mechanoreceptors (Juusola and French, 1997), but not unreasonable, given the smaller available bandwidth, less controlled input signal, and more demanding recording conditions.…”
Section: Information Capacity and Signal-to-noise Levelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The constant value of R within each group of experiments probably means that the sensory neurons all have similar general structure and function, with approximately the same noise level, and similar nonlinear contributions from stages such as action-potential encoding. The range of information capacity values (ϳ3-15 Bits/s) is lower than the value of ϳ200 Bits/s typically observed in spiking mechanoreceptors (Juusola and French, 1997), but not unreasonable, given the smaller available bandwidth, less controlled input signal, and more demanding recording conditions.…”
Section: Information Capacity and Signal-to-noise Levelsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is desirable, however, to obtain a quantitative measure of this reliability that is independent of the features encoded, the particular shapes of the action potentials, or any underlying mechanisms. We used repeated trial experiments to calculate the rate of information transfer between input and output, a standard measure used previously for spike rates (MacKay and McCulloch, 1952;Barlow, 1961;de Polavieja, 2002), for spike times (Juusola and French, 1997;Strong et al, 1998;Reinagel and Reid, 2000), and for the responses of graded neurons (van Steveninck and Laughlin, 1996; Juusola and de Polavieja, 2003). We calculated the rate of information transfer for three different cases: the full voltage waveform, spike waveforms alone, and stereotyped action potential trains in which the actual action potentials are replaced by the average (stereotyped) action potential waveform (Fig.…”
Section: Reliability Of Encoding Of Stimulus History Into Spike Wavefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some neurons, the information capacity for the spike train is 5-to 15-fold lower than for the graded potential (de Ruyter van Steveninck and Laughlin, 1996;Juusola and French 1997;Haag and Borst, 1998), implying 80 -95% information loss. The loss depends on the temporal structure of the stimulus and the response, on the noise properties of the neuron, and on the time scale used for analysis (Kretzberg et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the stochastically gated ion channels that comprise the spike generator contribute significantly to variability in the spike train (van Rossum et al, 2003). Together, such mechanisms reduce the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio (Barlow, 1957), implying that, in the conversion to a spike train, the spike generator removes information, some selectively and some indiscriminately (Juusola and French, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%