2006
DOI: 10.1039/b511643k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficiency of immobilised glutamate oxidase decreases with surface enzyme loading: an electrostatic effect, and reversal by a polycation significantly enhances biosensor sensitivity

Abstract: The apparent Michaelis constant, K M , for glutamate oxidase (GluOx) immobilised on Pt electrodes increased systematically with enzyme loading. The effect was due, at least in part, to electrostatic repulsion between neighbouring oxidase molecules and the anionic substrate, glutamate (Glu). This understanding has allowed us to increase the Glu sensitivity of GluOxbased amperometric biosensors in the linear response region (100 ¡ 11 nA cm 22 mM 21 at pH 7.4; SD, n = 23) by incorporating a polycation (polyethyle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(98 reference statements)
7
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with the hypothesis that for anionic substrates such as Glu interacting with polyanionic proteins (pI for GluOx is 6.2), 19 high loading of enzyme leads to an electrostatic barrier, reducing the affinity of enzyme for its substrate. 79 The overall outcome of this interaction is that increasing the density of GluOx on the disk surface increases the K M (Glu) significantly (see Figure 3) but has little effect on the LRS; indeed, there was no correlation (R 2 ) 0.01, n ) 62) between Glu sensitivity in the linear response region (LRS) and enzyme loading (J max ) over the range of J max shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are consistent with the hypothesis that for anionic substrates such as Glu interacting with polyanionic proteins (pI for GluOx is 6.2), 19 high loading of enzyme leads to an electrostatic barrier, reducing the affinity of enzyme for its substrate. 79 The overall outcome of this interaction is that increasing the density of GluOx on the disk surface increases the K M (Glu) significantly (see Figure 3) but has little effect on the LRS; indeed, there was no correlation (R 2 ) 0.01, n ) 62) between Glu sensitivity in the linear response region (LRS) and enzyme loading (J max ) over the range of J max shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are presently exploring the behavior of these biosensors in the intact brain in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, and stability in vivo. The oxygen dependence of PECbased biosensors, whose Glu sensitivity has been increased significantly by the incorporation of polyelectrolytes, 79 is also under investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1), it is evident that the selectivity coefficient depends on the sensitivity of the biosensors to glutamate. To improve the Glu sensitivity of the biosensor, a cationic polymer PEI was incorporated into the sensor matrix [22]. Disc sensors were therefore formed by dip coating PEI onto platinum discs, followed by dip evaporation of the enzyme and electropolymerization of the monomer o-PD with BSA at 0.65 V for 15 min.…”
Section: Pt D /Pei/gluox/ppd-bsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some electrode configurations were dipped in a 5% solution of Nafion and dried before being cured for 7-10 min at 170-180 • C [20,21]. The electrodes were dipped in a 1% solution of a polycationic polymer PEI and dried for 15 min immediately before immobilizing GluOx [22]. Deposition of the enzyme was carried out by immersing the electrodes in a buffered solution of the enzyme GluOx for 5 min to allow the adsorption of the enzyme on the discs and letting them dry for 5 min.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Working Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using implantable sensors allows for stable, long-term recording of a number of common analytes in the extracellular fluid (ECF) of the brain including oxygen (Lowry et al, 1996Lowry and Fillenz, 2001;Bolger and Lowry, 2005), glucose (Hu and Wilson, 1997;Fillenz and Lowry, 1998a;Lowry et al, 1998a,b,c;Lowry and Fillenz, 2001;Dixon et al, 2002), nitric oxide (Brown et al, 2009) and glutamate (Kulagina et al, 1999;McMahon et al, 2006aMcMahon et al, , 2006bMcMahon et al, , 2007Qin et al, 2008;Tian et al, 2009). Unlike other methods implanted into the brain tissue (Clark et al, 1958;Krolicki and Leniger-Follert, 1980;Doppenberg et al, 1998;Gupta et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%