2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017wr020991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficiency of Data Assimilation

Abstract: Data assimilation is the application of Bayes' theorem to condition the states of a dynamical systems model on observations. Any real‐world application of Bayes' theorem is approximate, and therefore, we cannot expect that data assimilation will preserve all of the information available from models and observations. We outline a framework for measuring information in models, observations, and evaluation data in a way that allows us to quantify information loss during (necessarily imperfect) data assimilation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using OpenForecast runoff forecasts as a first-guess forecast, CAHEM introduces the parsimonious data assimilation technique which uses recently observed runoff data for a further forecast updating procedure. This data assimilation technique significantly improves runoff prediction efficiency, and additionally underlines and confirms the importance of observational data assimilation for getting reliable hydrological modeling results [50,52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Using OpenForecast runoff forecasts as a first-guess forecast, CAHEM introduces the parsimonious data assimilation technique which uses recently observed runoff data for a further forecast updating procedure. This data assimilation technique significantly improves runoff prediction efficiency, and additionally underlines and confirms the importance of observational data assimilation for getting reliable hydrological modeling results [50,52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The pink shaded areas show the upstream sub-basins of the eight USGS streamflow sites evaluated in this study, with basin numbers labeled on the plot (see Table 1 for basin numbers and corresponding sites). (O'Neill et al, 2016) from 31 March 2015 to 31 December 2017 were used in this study. A few SMAP pixels with obvious quality flaws (i.e., near-constant retrieval values) were manually masked out.…”
Section: Smap Satellite Sm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information theoretic cost metrics have been previously used as likelihood functions for PFs in sensor network control, target tracking, and autonomous robotics (Charrow et al., 2014; Hoffmann & Tomlin, 2010; Zhang et al., 2018), however they have not been applied in hydrology. Some studies have used MI as a diagnostic metric for performance evaluation and observation impact (e.g., Fowler & Van Leeuwen, 2012, 2013; A. M. Fowler et al., 2018; Nearing et al., 2018), but it has never been used within a sequential data assimilation framework as a cost or likelihood function to rank model ensembles. Conversely, MI has been used rather ubiquitously in remote sensing; specifically in intensity based image matching and registration studies (Chen et al., 2003; Hirschmüller, 2008; Horkaew & Puttinaovarat, 2017; Liu et al., 2018; Suri & Reinartz, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used MI as a diagnostic metric for performance evaluation and observation impact (e.g., Fowler & Van Leeuwen, 2012, 2013A. M. Fowler et al, 2018;Nearing et al, 2018), but it has never been used within a sequential data assimilation framework as a cost or likelihood function to rank model ensembles. Conversely, MI has been used rather ubiquitously in remote sensing; specifically in intensity based image matching and registration studies (Chen et al, 2003;Hirschmüller, 2008;Horkaew & Puttinaovarat, 2017;Liu et al, 2018;Suri & Reinartz, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%