1962
DOI: 10.2307/2149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficiency of a Direct Current Electric Fishing Method in Trout Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream depth is one of the main limiting factors in studies based on electrofishing (Alabaster & Hartley ; Pusey et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Stream depth is one of the main limiting factors in studies based on electrofishing (Alabaster & Hartley ; Pusey et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of stream depth probably acts together with water conductivity, which is usually considered as the main limiting factor for electrofishing methods (Alabaster & Hartley ; Pusey et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the effects of a 1 °C temperature increase on capture efficiency are likely to be far smaller than the declines observed both salmon (50%) and trout juveniles (67%) in this study: the conductivity of stream water is reduced by only 2% per °C (Bohlin et al , 1989). Alabaster & Hartley (1962) described the impact of conductivity on the percentage of a fish population caught by direct current electrofishing according to the regression equation y =0.27 x –9.6, where y is the percentage catch and x is the conductivity (μS cm −1 ) of the water. In 2003, the in situ conductivity was measured across streams within the Wye catchment and ranged from 161 to 352 μS cm −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%