2020
DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_39_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of two doses versus 7 days' course of prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section: An experience from Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital

Abstract: Background: Postcesarean wound infection is a leading cause of prolonged hospital stay. Considerable debates still exist regarding choice of antibiotics, dose, and duration of use. Objectives: The objective is to compare the efficacy of 2 doses of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus a 7 days combination of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and metronidazole as prophylactic antibiotics following cesarean section (CS). Methodology: It was a randomized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise checkup at 2 weeks for SSI evaluation. 1 study had patients provided with at-home thermometer [31,32,39,[41][42][43].…”
Section: In Person 3 15 Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise checkup at 2 weeks for SSI evaluation. 1 study had patients provided with at-home thermometer [31,32,39,[41][42][43].…”
Section: In Person 3 15 Daysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies covered a wide geographical area with a majority in inpatient settings. Seven studies were conducted in Egypt [15,24,25,26,27,28,29], ve studies in India [12,14,30,31,32], four studies in Nigeria [33,34,35,36], three studies in Tanzania [8, 37,38,39], two studies each in Sudan [40,41], Uganda [13,42] and Bangladesh [30,43]. While one study each in South Africa [44], Gambia [46], Malawi [47] and Iran [48].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 17 RCTs (Table 2) assessed by using RoB2 all the 17 (100%) were considered low risk. Notably three studies [34,47,42] had some concerns of bias due to randomization process. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in non RCTs in 11 non-RCT (Table 3).…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations