2006
DOI: 10.1159/000095772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy of Postenucleation Saline Wash and the Effect of Different Antimicrobial Agents on Microbial Contamination of Donor Eyes

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of postenucleation saline wash and the effect of different antimicrobial agents on the microbial contamination of donor eyes. Methods: Two hundred donor eyes were given saline wash and treated with any one of the following 5 randomly selected antimicrobial solutions: 1% povidone-iodine for 3 min, 0.3% gentamycin for 10 min, 0.3% ciprofloxacin for 10 min, a combination of neomycin 1,700 IU, gramicidin 0.025% and polymyxin B 5,000 IU (Neosporin®) for 10 min and a combination … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] Noteworthy findings include that saline wash leads to a 20% decrease in microbial load, further instillation of 1% povidone-iodine for 3 min is most effective compared to the application of antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, combination of cefazolin and amikacin, Neosporin and gentamycin. Use of 5% povidone-iodine and amikacin was found to be better than 1% povidone-iodine and gentamicin but still not adequate to eliminate all Gram-negative organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] Noteworthy findings include that saline wash leads to a 20% decrease in microbial load, further instillation of 1% povidone-iodine for 3 min is most effective compared to the application of antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, combination of cefazolin and amikacin, Neosporin and gentamycin. Use of 5% povidone-iodine and amikacin was found to be better than 1% povidone-iodine and gentamicin but still not adequate to eliminate all Gram-negative organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Acinetobacter infection was previously reported to coexist with MALT lymphoma in the fallopian tube (Noack et al , 2002), it also represents the most common microbial contamination of eye specimens, detected in the corneas of 13·2% of donors. (Panda et al , 2006). Acinetobacter also represents the most common hospital contaminant and colonizes the skin of the forearms in 51% of healthy volunteers (Berlau et al , 1999), making surgeon‐to‐sample or pathologist‐to‐sample transmission highly likely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A superfície de cerca de 80% dos olhos enucleados apresenta-se colonizada por bactérias (2) . O perigo dessa contaminação é a transferência de germes, do enxerto para o interior do olho receptor, desencadeando infecção intraocular (3,4) .…”
Section: Inocuidadeunclassified