2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3454-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of orbital ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging findings with direct measurement of intracranial pressure in distinguishing papilledema from pseudopapilledema

Abstract: Ophthalmological review is important to avoid unnecessary procedures for detection of true papilledema. ONS diameter is a reliable neuroimaging marker as other subtle markers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transbulbar sonography technique for the estimation of ICP by measuring ONSD of children was first described by Helmke et al (9). So far, several studies evaluated the reliability of ONSD measurements by concurrent magnetic resonance imaging and invasive methods (10)(11)(12). Steinborn et al (13) observed 99 healthy children and adolescents in order to determine the normal values of ONSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transbulbar sonography technique for the estimation of ICP by measuring ONSD of children was first described by Helmke et al (9). So far, several studies evaluated the reliability of ONSD measurements by concurrent magnetic resonance imaging and invasive methods (10)(11)(12). Steinborn et al (13) observed 99 healthy children and adolescents in order to determine the normal values of ONSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been used to detect elevated ICP with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 84 to 98% and 42 to 92%, respectively (►Table 1). [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The values can be compared with the results of two different meta-analyses from 2011 and 2015 that demonstrated the ability of ONSD ultrasonography to yield average sensitivity and specificity ranging from 90 to 95% and 85 to 92%, respectively. 29,30 A more recent meta-analysis found sensitivity and specificity to range from 88 to 95% and 74 to 96%, respectively.…”
Section: Noninvasive Diagnostics and Monitoring Noninvasive Measuremementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of ONSD using ocular ultrasound is a noninvasive and reliable method for the assessment of ICP. Numerous studies have proven that ONSD measured by ocular ultrasound correlates well with the degree of ICP changes [9][10][11][12][13]. Also, this measurement technique has shown excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility (0.25-0.3 mm) [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%