The efficacy of cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Cho, Kyu‐Sup; Shin, Seung-Kuk; Lee, Jung‐Hoon; Kim, Joo-Yeon; Koo, Soo Kweon; Kim, Minjung; Roh, Hwan‐Jung

doi:10.1002/lary.23643

Cited by 37 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(63 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The same four studies [8,11,13,15] also reported the sex distribution of the participants, with the ratio of males ranging from 54 to 67%. For the absorbable nasal packing materials, MeroGel ® was used in two studies [8,12], while Cutanplast [15], carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) foam [13], and NasoPore [11] were used in the other three studies, respectively. For nonabsorbable nasal packing material, Merocel was used in three studies [8,11,15], polyvinyl alcohol sponges [12], and routine nasal packing (coton gauze placed in a latex glove inger) [13] were used in the remaining two studies respectively.…”

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 93%

“…Table 1 summarized the systematic review, which included the studies characteristics [8,[11][12][13]15]. A total of 241 nasal cavities were treated in each group for all studies combined and the number of nasal cavities treated in each study ranged from 30 to 100.…”

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 241 nasal cavities were treated in each group for all studies combined and the number of nasal cavities treated in each study ranged from 30 to 100. Four of the ive studies [8,11,13,15] reported the age of study participants which ranging from 35.7 to 43.2 years among three studies [8,13,15] and 54.0 years in one study [11]. The same four studies [8,11,13,15] also reported the sex distribution of the participants, with the ratio of males ranging from 54 to 67%.…”

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four of the ive studies [8,11,13,15] reported the age of study participants which ranging from 35.7 to 43.2 years among three studies [8,13,15] and 54.0 years in one study [11]. The same four studies [8,11,13,15] also reported the sex distribution of the participants, with the ratio of males ranging from 54 to 67%. For the absorbable nasal packing materials, MeroGel ® was used in two studies [8,12], while Cutanplast [15], carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) foam [13], and NasoPore [11] were used in the other three studies, respectively.…”

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the absorbable nasal packing materials, MeroGel ® was used in two studies [8,12], while Cutanplast [15], carboxymethylated cellulose (CMC) foam [13], and NasoPore [11] were used in the other three studies, respectively. For nonabsorbable nasal packing material, Merocel was used in three studies [8,11,15], polyvinyl alcohol sponges [12], and routine nasal packing (coton gauze placed in a latex glove inger) [13] were used in the remaining two studies respectively. Among the ive studies, four [8,12,13,15] of which reported on postoperative treatments with the administration of various antibiotics, three [8,11,13] of which reported on the time to packing removal which ranging from 1 to 7 days.…”

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Nasal Packing after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Wang¹,

Hsiao²

2017

Paranasal Sinuses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter was to have a systematic review and meta-analysis on the available literature in order to compare the eicacy and postoperative outcomes of nasal packing (absorbable vs. nonabsorbable) after treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The systematic review included ive studies with 241 nasal cavities in each treatment group. The prevalence of synechia in the absorbable groups ranged from 4.6 to 8.0% while nonabsorbable groups ranged from 8.0 to 35.7%. The absorbable group had a lower postoperative bleeding; however, there were no clear indings on postoperative pain. Postoperative edema was in general similar among groups, and no consistent indings were found on bleeding and pain while removing packing. The meta-analysis included two studies using the same type of packing material. The combined OR (0.33, 95% CI = 0.04-2.78) for postoperative synechia did not signiicantly favor (P = 0.016308) absorbable packing over nonabsorbable packing. The available literature showed that there is some evidence that absorbable nasal packing may provide superior outcomes to nonabsorbable packing after FESS. However, lack of homogeneity between these studies makes it impossible to have a deinitive conclusion.

show abstract

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Nasal Packing after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Wang¹,

Hsiao²

2017

Paranasal Sinuses

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Orlandi

Kingdom

Hwang

et al. 2016

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

Self Cite

554

888

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis (RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). Methods:Evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR) was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results:The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS) with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AE-CRS), and pediatric RS. Conclusion:As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too o en the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lowerlevel evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed. C 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC. Key Words:rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; acute rhinosinusitis; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis; evidence-based medicine; systematic review; endoscopic sinus surgery List of Abbreviations Used

show abstract

Effects of mometasone furoate–impregnated biodegradable nasal dressing on endoscopic appearance in healing process following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study

Zhao

2018

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Postoperative care is an important factor affecting the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The aim of this study was to test the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)‐soaked biodegradable nasal dressings (BNDs) on endoscopic appearance in CRS patients with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) after ESS. Methods This study was a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study. A total of 64 CRSwNP patients with bilateral ESS were enrolled and randomly given 4 mL or 8 mL of MF‐soaked BNDs (NasoPore) in 1 nasal cavity and the same amount of normal saline‐soaked BNDs in the contralateral side. The BNDs were removed on the 7th or 14th postoperative day. Perioperative sinus endoscopy (POSE) and Lund‐Kennedy scores were collected, on the 7th or 14th postoperative days and at 1, 2, and 3 postoperative months. Results The POSE and Lund‐Kennedy scores showed that in the 4‐mL, 1‐week group, no significant differences between the sides treated with MF‐soaked BNDs and the normal saline‐soaked control were observed at any postoperative visits. In the 4‐mL, 2‐week group, significant differences were found at the 2‐week and 1‐month postoperative visits but not at the 2‐month and 3‐month visits. In the 8‐mL, 1‐week group, significant differences were found at the 1‐week, 1‐month, and 2‐month postoperative visits but not at the 3‐month visit. In the 8‐mL, 2‐week group, significant differences were found at all postoperative visits. Conclusion This study reveals that MF‐impregnated BNDs improve the endoscopic appearance in the healing process of CRSwNP after ESS.

show abstract

The efficacy of cutanplast nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Abstract: Cutanplast nasal pack results in significantly less pain and less bleeding compared to Merocel pack.

Cited by 37 publications

References 26 publications

Nasal Packing after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Nasal Packing after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Effects of mometasone furoate–impregnated biodegradable nasal dressing on endoscopic appearance in healing process following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About