1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80720-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of computed tomography in evaluating abdominal injuries in children with major head trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as opposed to the data of Beaver et al [13], none of our patients, whether or not they had a head injury, had clinically occult renal trauma. All had abnormal abdominal physical findings, large amounts of hematunia, shock, or some combination of these.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as opposed to the data of Beaver et al [13], none of our patients, whether or not they had a head injury, had clinically occult renal trauma. All had abnormal abdominal physical findings, large amounts of hematunia, shock, or some combination of these.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties in the clinical evaluation of abdominal injury, especially in patients with associated head injuries, was shown by Beaver et al [12]. In 65 children with major head injury (Glasgow Coma Score less than 10) and mere suspicion of abdominal trauma, they found 15 patients (23 %) with significant intra-abdominal injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are different from previous reports. In a study of 65 children with severe traumatic brain injuries, Beaver et al 8 found the most common mechanisms of injuries were pedestrians struck by automobiles (66%), followed by falls (14%) and occupants in MVCs (9%). Holmes et al, 9 in the identification of intra-abdominal injuries in 1,095 children after blunt trauma, found the predominant mechanisms of injuries to be passengers in motor vehicle collisions (36%), followed by pedestrians struck by automobiles (24%) and falls (17%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%