2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of cefmetazole against pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Abstract: Cefmetazole may be a useful option for the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-producing organisms. Prospective and larger sized studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, 5 reports have evaluated the efficacy of cephamycins for the treatment of infections ESBL-producing members of the Enterobacteriaceae (8,(19)(20)(21)(22). All of these single-center retrospective studies included a small number of patients and a control group comprised of patients receiving carbapenem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, 5 reports have evaluated the efficacy of cephamycins for the treatment of infections ESBL-producing members of the Enterobacteriaceae (8,(19)(20)(21)(22). All of these single-center retrospective studies included a small number of patients and a control group comprised of patients receiving carbapenem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the effectiveness of treatment using cephamycins and oxacephems for the ESBL-producing organisms are scarce (31,32), and further studies regarding the optimal clinical uses of these drugs for the treatment of ESBL-producing E. coli are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, clinical data evaluating cephamycins for ESBL infections are scarce, and data comparing the relative efficacy of the various cephamycins are virtually nonexistent. Existing observational studies comparing cephamycins and carbapenems are plagued by the inherent limitations of observational studies-most notably confounding by indication-as well as small sample sizes (Table 2) [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Only 1 of these studies showed improved outcomes among ESBL-infected patients treated with carbapenems compared with cephamycins, while the others could not detect differences [18] (Table 3).…”
Section: Cephamycinsmentioning
confidence: 99%