2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-1008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy and Safety of Early Postoperative Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Facial Scars

Abstract: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies (Table ) have been conducted to show the efficiency of BoNT‐A in surgical scars and wound healing. A study conducted by Lee et al found early postoperative BoNT‐A injection to be safe and effective in improving the scar qualities.…”
Section: Bont‐a In the Prevention And Treatment Of Pathological Scarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies (Table ) have been conducted to show the efficiency of BoNT‐A in surgical scars and wound healing. A study conducted by Lee et al found early postoperative BoNT‐A injection to be safe and effective in improving the scar qualities.…”
Section: Bont‐a In the Prevention And Treatment Of Pathological Scarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 10 studies were included in the comparison, but two studies measured the data from two points, so there were 12 data in total (Figure ). The standardized mean difference (SMD) was chosen because of the large gap between the research results (0.32 ~ 3.25 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 9 studies were included in the comparison (Figure ) . The heterogeneity test suggested that there was heterogeneity between studies ( χ 2 = 139.16, P < .00001, I 2 = 94%>50%), so the random effect model was adopted for the combination, WMD = −1.82[95%CI: (−2.54,‐1.10), P < .00001]; The results suggested that the VSS scores were significantly different between the two groups, and the VSS score was lower in the BTXA group than in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations