2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in treatment of chronic hepatitis B and HBV related cirrhosis: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, studies using sensitive markers of glomerular and tubular kidney function and of bone mineral density have also reported chronic tubular damage and decline of eGFR and bone mineral density in TDF treated patients. 70,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] Therefore, it seems appropriate for now to monitor all CHB patients treated with TDF therapy for adverse renal effects with serum creatinine (eGFR) and serum phosphate levels. Moreover, CHB patients at high renal risk undergoing any NA therapy should be monitored with serum creatinine (eGFR) levels.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Patients Treated With Etv Tdf or Taf Recommenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies using sensitive markers of glomerular and tubular kidney function and of bone mineral density have also reported chronic tubular damage and decline of eGFR and bone mineral density in TDF treated patients. 70,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] Therefore, it seems appropriate for now to monitor all CHB patients treated with TDF therapy for adverse renal effects with serum creatinine (eGFR) and serum phosphate levels. Moreover, CHB patients at high renal risk undergoing any NA therapy should be monitored with serum creatinine (eGFR) levels.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Patients Treated With Etv Tdf or Taf Recommenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in previous trials of TDF and ETV, the baseline renal conditions and risk factors were not analysed in detail, with the exception of normal mean eGFR. Moreover, the results of renal safety profiles from several observational studies compared TDF and ETV in CHB patients, in which various definitions and cutoff values were used, remained conflicting . Of importance is that the baseline conditions which are strongly related to chronic kidney disease (CKD), including the CKD stage, proteinuria, and haematuria, have not been completely analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While HP NAs with good renal safety pro le are preferred since most of the patients require lifelong treatment. Minimal rates of renal function decline had been reported during long-term therapy with ETV and TDF in patients with CHB, while the nephrotoxic potential was higher for TDF 20,[72][73][74] . There had been several cases about TDF-associated Fanconi syndrome, including one LT recipient [75][76][77] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%