2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and effect on gut microbiota of an aflatoxin binder and a fumonisin esterase using an in vitro simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME®)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such microbial hydrolysis was also detected in this study, as levels of pHFB1a and pHFB1b were measured in both the serum and faecal samples in the placebo group (no enzyme administered). Even though most studies report a predominant formation of partially hydrolysed metabolites [19,41], HFB1 was equally observed at low concentrations in the placebo group where exclusively FB1 was administered, suggesting further degradation of the partially hydrolysed forms, most likely due to activity of the bacterial microbiota [51]. Furthermore, these findings were reflected in the serum in our study, where HFB1 levels were also observed in the placebo group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such microbial hydrolysis was also detected in this study, as levels of pHFB1a and pHFB1b were measured in both the serum and faecal samples in the placebo group (no enzyme administered). Even though most studies report a predominant formation of partially hydrolysed metabolites [19,41], HFB1 was equally observed at low concentrations in the placebo group where exclusively FB1 was administered, suggesting further degradation of the partially hydrolysed forms, most likely due to activity of the bacterial microbiota [51]. Furthermore, these findings were reflected in the serum in our study, where HFB1 levels were also observed in the placebo group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The juvenile pig was used as model for the toddler; as young children are at a higher risk of mycotoxicoses due to higher exposure (a higher food intake/kg body weight (BW) and a higher consumption of cerealbased products), and a lower detoxification capacity due to metabolic and physiological immaturity [38][39][40]. In a previous experiment, this esterase demonstrated a promising effect in reducing FB1 concentrations in the human intestinal environment, using a toddler Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem [41]. A nearly complete reduction in FB1 concentration was achieved following addition of the enzyme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SHIME media comprise arabinogalactan (1.0 g/L), pectin (2.0 g/L), xylan (1.0 g/L), starch (4.0 g/L), glucose (0.4 g/L), yeast extract (3.0 g/L), peptone (3.0 g/L), mucin (1.0 g/L), and cysteine (0.5 g/L) (Abbeele et al, 2010). The specific nutrient medium (PD‐NM005) is also provided by the manufacturer of the SHIME, ProDigest (Bondue et al, 2020; Neckermann et al, 2021). In SHIME, the inoculated microbiota usually takes 10–20 days to stabilize in the fermenter with a low to medium flow rate (Table 4), which is called the adaption time.…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, according to their suitability different SHIME models are regularly used in various dietary studies, including the effect of detoxification of food‐borne mycotoxins on the gut community (Neckermann et al, 2021), the spread of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiome (Lambrecht et al, 2019), the protective role of probiotics against antibiotic‐induced gut‐dysbiosis (Marzorati et al, 2020), the impact of dietary emulsifier on gut community (Miclotte et al, 2021), and the impact of dietary polyphenols on gut microbiota (Zorraquín et al, 2020).…”
Section: Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the most effective method to control the AFM1 concentration in milk is applying good agricultural practices (GAP) to reduce AFB1 contamination of raw materials and cattle feed [ 9 ]. Post-harvest intervention strategies can also be applied to reduce animal and human AFs exposure, such as dehulling, fermentation, nixtamalization, or the usage of mycotoxin modifiers and/or binders [ 16 , 17 ]. In addition, regulations have been developed for AFB1 and total AFs (sum of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2) in food and feeds by several countries [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%