2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)01659-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of π-acceptor and π-donor substitution in cross-conjugated enynes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple conduction pathways in different dimensions are accessible by using cross-conjugated compounds 2022,29,30. Electron-donor and -acceptor moieties are frequently incorporated into cross-conjugated structures to improve the dimensionality of electronic communication 4,5,10,22,27,3640. Judicial placement of the donor and acceptor groups allows spatial separation of the HOMO and LUMO, as revealed by quantum-mechanical calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple conduction pathways in different dimensions are accessible by using cross-conjugated compounds 2022,29,30. Electron-donor and -acceptor moieties are frequently incorporated into cross-conjugated structures to improve the dimensionality of electronic communication 4,5,10,22,27,3640. Judicial placement of the donor and acceptor groups allows spatial separation of the HOMO and LUMO, as revealed by quantum-mechanical calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] However, systematic investigations of the synthesis and optoelectronic properties of monoA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G disperse all-trans-oligodiacetylenes (or trans-oligo-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G enynes) still remain very scarce. This is remarkable considering that polydiacetylenes (PDAs) figure prominently in current research on electronically conducting polymers (> 1500 publications since 1990 [31] ) and are of interest as nonlinear optical materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the peripheral groups (cyclohexylidene vs. isopropylidene) is negligible as shown by comparison of the UV/VIS spectra of iso-PTA dimers containing the two types of peripheral groups [11]. UV/VIS and structural data [1] strongly indicate the absence of cross-conjugation in the parent, nonexpanded dendralenes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%