The effects of visual magnification and physical movement scale on the manipulation of a tool with indirect vision.

Abstract

Modern tools often separate the visual and physical aspects of operation, requiring users to manipulate an instrument while viewing the results indirectly on a display. This can pose usability challenges particularly in applications, such as laparoscopic surgery, that require a high degree of movement precision. Magnification used to augment the view and, theoretically, enable finer movements, may introduce other visual-motor disruptions due to the apparent speed of the visual motion on screen (i.e., motion scaling). In this research, we sought to better understand the effects of visual magnification on human movement performance and control in operating a tool via indirect vision. Ten adult participants manipulated a computer mouse to direct a pointer to targets on a display. Results (Experiment 1) showed that, despite increased motion scaling, magnification of the view on screen enabled higher precision control of the mouse pointer. However, the relative effectiveness of visual magnification ultimately depended on the scale of the physical movement, and more specifically the precision limits of the whole-hand grip afforded by the mouse. When the physical scale of the hand/mouse movement was reduced (Experiment 2), fine-precision control began to reach its limits, even at full magnification. The role of magnification can thus be understood as "amplifying" the particular skill level afforded by the effecting limb. These findings suggest a fruitful area for future research is the optimization of hand-control interfaces of tools to maximize movement precision.

The effects of control-display gain on performance of race car drivers in an isometric braking task

“…Accot & Zhai, 2001;Kwon, Choi, & Chung, 2011;Lin, Radwin, & Vanderheiden, 1992;MacKenzie & Riddersma, 1994). Others have reported that performance improves with gain (Bohan, McConnell, Chaparro, & Thompson, 2010;Gibbs, 1962;Huysmans, De Looze, Hoozemans, Van der Beek, & Van Dieën, 2006;Johnsgard, 1994;Thompson, McConnell, Slocum, & Bohan, 2007;Van Doorn, Unema, & Hendriks, 2005). Yet others have reported that performance decreases with gain (e.g.…”

Comparing the Performance, Workload, and Usability of a Gamepad and Joystick in a Complex Task

“…Additionally, we are pursuing studies using other psychomotor tasks such as the Fitts' pointing task (Fitts 1954;Fitts & Peterson, 1964) to compare the bandwidth of the devices (e.g., MacKenzie, 1992) as well as examine the separate physical and visual characteristics of the pointing task (e.g., Bohan, McConnell, Chaparro, & Thompson, 2010).…”

“…Future studies are planned that include adding stressors such as noise and vibration to simulate the complex environments in which these controls are sometimes used. Additionally, we are pursuing studies using other psychomotor tasks such as the Fitts' pointing task (Fitts 1954;Fitts & Peterson, 1964) to compare the bandwidth of the devices (e.g., Mac-Kenzie, 1992) as well as examine the separate physical and visual characteristics of the pointing task (e.g., Bohan, McConnell, Chaparro, & Thompson, 2010).…”

Camera Placement in Simulated Laparoscopic Surgery Influences Performance

“…This results in a small movement of the tip of the grasper appearing as a large movement on the monitor (DeLucia & Griswold, 2011). Gain distortions have been shown to be associated with movement error (Bohan, McConnell, Chaparro, & Thompson, 2010). Fourth, sometimes the camera is rotated to the right or left of the surgeon's hands, resulting in visuomotor rotations.…”