40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &Amp; Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of upstream mass injection on a Mach 2 cavity flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluids 25, 086101 (2013) 19 2.54 1.0 1.8 5.18 × 10 6 /m Two perforated plates with 175 holes Wilcox 20 4-18 1.6-2.86 6.56 × 10 6 /m Mass transport through a porous cavity floor Lamp and Chokani 23 4.33 2D c 1.75 5.58 × 10 7 /m A steady or pulsed jet placed within the cavity below the front cavity lip Bueno et al 24 5-9 3 2 3.0 × 10 7 /m Six high frequency pulsed jets located just upstream of LE b Rizzetta and Visbal 25 5 0.5 1. 19 2 × 10 5 (L) Pulsed jet at a very high frequency located at LE b Ukeiley et al 26 5.5 3 1.5 1.0 × 10 5 (δ) Microjets and rectangular slot jets spaced along LE b Zhuang et al 6 5.16 0.87 2 2.8 × 10 6 (L) An array of supersonic microjets spaced along LE b Arunajatesan et al 27 5.6 0.55 1.5 1.0 × 10 5 (δ) A set of three slots spanning LE b Lusk et al 29 Among various active noise control methods, fluid mass injection is a promising candidate.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fluids 25, 086101 (2013) 19 2.54 1.0 1.8 5.18 × 10 6 /m Two perforated plates with 175 holes Wilcox 20 4-18 1.6-2.86 6.56 × 10 6 /m Mass transport through a porous cavity floor Lamp and Chokani 23 4.33 2D c 1.75 5.58 × 10 7 /m A steady or pulsed jet placed within the cavity below the front cavity lip Bueno et al 24 5-9 3 2 3.0 × 10 7 /m Six high frequency pulsed jets located just upstream of LE b Rizzetta and Visbal 25 5 0.5 1. 19 2 × 10 5 (L) Pulsed jet at a very high frequency located at LE b Ukeiley et al 26 5.5 3 1.5 1.0 × 10 5 (δ) Microjets and rectangular slot jets spaced along LE b Zhuang et al 6 5.16 0.87 2 2.8 × 10 6 (L) An array of supersonic microjets spaced along LE b Arunajatesan et al 27 5.6 0.55 1.5 1.0 × 10 5 (δ) A set of three slots spanning LE b Lusk et al 29 Among various active noise control methods, fluid mass injection is a promising candidate.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…22 Lamp and Ghokani 23 stated that the forcing of zeronet-mass-flux jets was effective in reducing the cavity oscillations, and the effectiveness strongly depended on the amplitude and frequency of the jet and weakly depended on the phase angle and duty cycle of the jet. Bueno et al 24 attempted to reduce the surface pressure fluctuations within cavities of various length using both steady and pulsed mass injection. They found that continuous injection was more effective than pulsed injection.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported a 27-dB reduction in the peak tones in the cavity and concluded that the mass injection altered the feedback in the cavity. Bueno et al (2002) examined various length cavities in a Mach 2 flow subject to steady and pulsed blowing and found the steady blowing to be more effective at reducing the surface pressure fluctuations. Zhuang et al (2006) used leading edge microjets to alter the shear layer over the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even today, the complete understanding of flow physics remains elusive and modeling of cavity flows to calculate frequencies and amplitudes of the oscillations continues to be a challenging task. Several control techniques (Vakili and Guthier 1994;Cattafesta et al 1999;Zhuang et al 2006;Ukeiley et al 2002;Stanek et al 2003;Bueno et al 2002;Sarno and Franke 1994;Sarohia and Massier 1977;Sahoo et al 2005;Arunajatesan et al 2009) have been examined and employed in the past to control the cavity oscillations. These include both passive and active control methods.…”
Section: List Of Symbols Lmentioning
confidence: 99%