2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0023-9690(02)00507-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of unconditional stimulus valence and conditioning paradigm on verbal, skeleto-motor, and autonomic indices of human Pavlovian conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the magnitude of phasic fear-potentiated startle is generally larger for a verbal threat. For example, we have shown that startle magnitude can be doubled during verbal threat (Grillon et al , 1991, 1993a, b), whereas we and others have reported startle potentiation of <50% during fear conditioning paradigms (Baas et al , 2004; Lipp et al , 1994, 2003), although it can be higher in certain patients (Jovanovic et al , 2009). Finally, as learning is minimized during verbal threat, such procedures can be used in repeated designs.…”
Section: Models To Study Phasic Fear In Rats and Humansmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Third, the magnitude of phasic fear-potentiated startle is generally larger for a verbal threat. For example, we have shown that startle magnitude can be doubled during verbal threat (Grillon et al , 1991, 1993a, b), whereas we and others have reported startle potentiation of <50% during fear conditioning paradigms (Baas et al , 2004; Lipp et al , 1994, 2003), although it can be higher in certain patients (Jovanovic et al , 2009). Finally, as learning is minimized during verbal threat, such procedures can be used in repeated designs.…”
Section: Models To Study Phasic Fear In Rats and Humansmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Opposite predictions are made by accounts that propose that the process underlying EC is the same as the process underlying (other forms of) Pavlovian Conditioning (Lipp et al, 2003; Lipp and Purkis, 2005, 2006). Pavlovian Conditioning is generally regarded as a form of signal learning in which propositions are formed about CS–US contingencies.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far studies examining the role of extinction in EC have yielded mixed results, several studies report that the evaluation of the CS remains stable after an extinction procedure (Baeyens et al, 1988; Díaz et al, 2005), while others found that the evaluations returned to neutral during extinction (Lipp et al, 2003; Lipp and Purkis, 2006). A recent meta-analysis suggests that the EC effect does not disappear after repeated presentation, but does decrease compared to the effect measured directly after conditioning (Hofmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Experiments 2: Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, significant startle potentiation has been found in anticipation of pleasant stimuli (Lipp et al, 2001;Sabatinelli et al, 2001). Finally, in conditioning procedures, significant startle potentiation has been found during nonaversive conditioning and in absence of a change of conditional stimulus valence (Lipp, 2002;Lipp et al, 2003b). Blink startle potentiation is a highly useful and versatile measure that can provide psychophysiologists with unique insights that are otherwise not available.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%