1978
DOI: 10.1080/09553007714551521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Ultra-high Dose Rates on Survival and Sublethal Repair in Chinese-hamster Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the calculated D o values ( Table 1) and the actual cell survival for doses greater than 4 Gy are used as criteria, both pulsed electrons and pulsed X rays (bremsstrahlung) from the LINAC a more efficient in killing mammalian cells than continuous exposure to Cesium v-rays at moderate and lower dose rates. This finding appears to be in contrast to studies by other investigators, who have compared mammalian cell survival after exposure to ultrahigh dose rate, pulsed electrons (30 MeV) versus exposure to 280 kVp X rays; they reported that X rays were more effective for cell lethality (3,4). In tht latter expeyimencs (4), the average dose rate per electron pulse was 5 x 10…”
contrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the calculated D o values ( Table 1) and the actual cell survival for doses greater than 4 Gy are used as criteria, both pulsed electrons and pulsed X rays (bremsstrahlung) from the LINAC a more efficient in killing mammalian cells than continuous exposure to Cesium v-rays at moderate and lower dose rates. This finding appears to be in contrast to studies by other investigators, who have compared mammalian cell survival after exposure to ultrahigh dose rate, pulsed electrons (30 MeV) versus exposure to 280 kVp X rays; they reported that X rays were more effective for cell lethality (3,4). In tht latter expeyimencs (4), the average dose rate per electron pulse was 5 x 10…”
contrasting
confidence: 60%
“…A variety of studies have been conducted using pulsed electron radiation in nanosecond (ns) to microsecond (As) pulses (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studied failed to clarify the influence of UHDR and pulsed irradiation modality on cellular response. Schulz et al [22] found a pulsed 30-MeV electron beam at 0.5 -5 10 8 Gy/s to be less effective at cell killing compared to 250 kV X-rays, but they could not relate their results to oxygen consumption. Purdie et al [23] found opposite results using similar experimental conditions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the biological effectiveness of laser-accelerated particles has to be characterized in appropriate experiments. Previous studies have been performed with ultrashort pulsed electron [17][18][19] and soft x-ray [20][21][22] beams delivered with maximum pulse dose rates of 10 9 Gy/ s ͑Ref. 19͒ for electrons and 10 13 Gy/ s ͑Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20͒ for photons, respectively. In all of these studies the cellular survival was investigated, revealing either no influence 18,19,21 or a reduction 17,20,22 in the cytotoxicity by means of the ultrahigh dose rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%