2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of turbulence on three‐dimensional magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause

Abstract: Two‐ and three‐dimensional particle‐in‐cell simulations of a recent encounter of the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission (MMS) with an electron diffusion region at the magnetopause are presented. While the two‐dimensional simulation is laminar, turbulence develops at both the X line and along the magnetic separatrices in the three‐dimensional simulation. The turbulence is strong enough to make the magnetic field around the reconnection island chaotic and produces both anomalous resistivity and anomalous viscosit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
151
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
151
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These fluctuations are not likely to correspond to anomalous fields. Overall, our results are consistent with previous observations and simulations of anomalous drag associated with asymmetric reconnection [ Mozer et al , ; Pritchett , ] but are smaller than the values obtained by Price et al [].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These fluctuations are not likely to correspond to anomalous fields. Overall, our results are consistent with previous observations and simulations of anomalous drag associated with asymmetric reconnection [ Mozer et al , ; Pritchett , ] but are smaller than the values obtained by Price et al [].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The reconnecting current layer width is thus well determined, and very small, ~1.8 d e . There are features of this EDR that confirm some properties of previous EDR observations and simulations: the unambiguous normal component of B ; the pronounced enhancement of the energy conversion, J • E ′; the clearly discernible electron crescent structures; and the observed reconnection electric fields, although simulations would imply a smaller reconnection value (Drake & Shay, , or Price et al, ). It is worth noting that this component cannot be very much smaller than the observed 2–3 mV/m, because (1) the value of the total current is confirmed here with two different methods (the curl of B, and direct plasma moments) and is ~4–5 μA/m 2 ; (2) the J • E ′ value does not depend on our LMN coordinate system and varies from 10 to 30 nW/m 3 for the four spacecraft; (3) the value of E′ is confirmed by our modified electron moment procedure to be no less that perhaps 30% of the value used in this power computation, and thus perhaps the power may be as low as 7–20 nW/m 3 ; thus, a simple division gives a field of at least 1.4–4 mV/m in the direction of J .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…20 The question might therefore arise to which degree such a model represents reality correctly. NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission measures currents, electric fields, and small-scale gradients of plasma quantities in central diffusion zones of near-Earth reconnection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%