2009
DOI: 10.1577/t09-015.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass

Abstract: Turbidity in aquatic systems can change rapidly, affecting the visual ability of predators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
5
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
89
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stomach content analysis was performed on individuals (Appendix A), with foraging rate calculated as the total number of prey in stomachs. At the time of collection, ambient crustacean zooplankton density (number of individuals/m 3 ; the basal resource) was measured, as was Secchi depth (i.e., water clarity; nearest 1 cm), which is strongly inversely related to turbidity (e.g., Shoup and Wahl 2009:…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stomach content analysis was performed on individuals (Appendix A), with foraging rate calculated as the total number of prey in stomachs. At the time of collection, ambient crustacean zooplankton density (number of individuals/m 3 ; the basal resource) was measured, as was Secchi depth (i.e., water clarity; nearest 1 cm), which is strongly inversely related to turbidity (e.g., Shoup and Wahl 2009:…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help better link our model predictions with our field results, we conducted a 2 3 2 factorial laboratory experiment in which foraging rates of age-0 yellow perch (intermediate consumer) on a basal resource (planktonic Artemia nauplii ) were quantified under two conditions of turbidity (0 and 38 NTU) and two conditions of predation risk (absence and presence of predator cues). The 38 NTU turbidity treatment approximates the level at which foraging peaked for our Lake Erie yellow perch (Shoup and Wahl 2009). Thus, our experimental treatments allowed for a contrast between when TMIEs would be expected to be maximal (i.e., predation risk present, clear water) versus minimal (i.e., predation risk present, turbid water).…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SS can inhibit the predation of visually oriented fish on zooplankton (Schulze 2011) and piscivorous fish on fish prey (Shoup & Wahl 2009) while less inhibition to filter-feeding fish, e.g. A. nobilis.…”
Section: Effect Of Ss On Fish Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparency is related to underwater visibility because light intensity declines with increasing water turbidity (Brönmark and Hansson 2005). Since largemouth bass are visual predators (Howick and O'Brien 1983), their predatory efficiency decreases with increasing water turbidity (Reid et al 1999;Shoup and Wahl 2009). On the other hand, aquatic vegetation cover generally benefits many fishes by providing habitat heterogeneity (Eadie and Keast 1984), breeding and feeding sites (Werner et al 1978(Werner et al , 1983, and refuge to avoid predation (Gotceitas and Colgan 1989;Persson and Eklöv 1995;Warfe and Barmuta 2004).…”
Section: Multiple Effects Of Exotic Largemouth Bass and Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 99%