2009
DOI: 10.1177/0017896909339454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of training medical students in motivational interviewing

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of brief training in Motivational interviewing (MI) for medical students. Design Video recordings of consultations between 113 final-year medical students and simulated patients were scored blind by two independent raters with the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC). Half of the students participated in a four-hour motivational interviewing workshop while the other half did not. Results Differences between the two groups were statistically significant for five of six gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…values are in line with proficiency-level benchmarks that have been proposed for good levels of MI(Opheim et al, 2009). Motivation to change.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…values are in line with proficiency-level benchmarks that have been proposed for good levels of MI(Opheim et al, 2009). Motivation to change.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…One reason why we did not find facilitative effects of MI-consistent behaviour on change talk in our present samples may be that change agents need to be professionally trained in MI in order to show high quantities of MI-consistent and low quantities of MI-inconsistent behaviours (Opheim, Andreasson, Eklund, & Prescott, 2009). Even though the change agents in our two studies showed MI-consistent behaviour, they were not MI experts and hence did not carry out the intervention method as it was originally intended.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Thus, in the case of full therapeutic approaches, which involve multiple, highly complex behaviors, educational sessions are unlikely to change therapists' subsequent behavior in a significant way. Opheim et al (2009), for example, concluded that a workshop in motivational interviewing was sufficient to produce some immediate changes in medical student behaviors, but insufficient to produce proficiency in the full model. Therefore, additional interventions are required to facilitate treatment adoption following an educational session, including monitoring and feedback (Durlak and DuPre 2008;Edwards et al 2001).…”
Section: Post-training Monitoring and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%